I told you so

I told you so.

I was right.

I never wanted to make saying that a matter of pride.

In advanlet me say.

I havealways defendedthe tips thatwaiters, meaning the workers, receive.

Tipping ispart of our culture.

My first encounter with tipping In my childhood,cinemas started with signs at the entrance saying“tipping is optional for those who show you to your seat.”The literal meaning of optional

is at one's own discretion.So, tipping was supposedly optional.What do you mean, optional?

It was just a way of saying it.

My objection is to when venue owners turned tips into a source of income.

First it was a tip. Then it became a service charge.

The nature of the business changed.

After eating our meal, westarted with what we felt like givingas a tip First the name changed.

It was added to the bottom of the bill as a service fee.

Why was it added to the bottom of the bill?

The incoming bills grew. Since no one carries that much cash in their pocket, they either left small tips orgave a tip or left the table without tipping.

Venue owners noticed that tip revenues had decreased.

They found the solution in a service charge.

Since the billswere paidby creditcard, theyAfter accounting for VAT and income tax on the tip, half of it went to the state. Only half of the service fee paid actually reached the waiter'shands.

If you really wantthe tip you give to reach the waiterin full, you shouldgo to the restaurant with cash.

Pay your tip in cash, not by credit card.

The service fee, which started at 5percent, later rose to 10 percent, 15 percent, and finally climbed up to 20percent.

It is already one of theworld'smost expensivediningwhose food we eat, whosedrinks weconsume, it is unfair toadd a 20 percent service charge to the bill we pay in ourcountry.

Food sYou say separately we pay, separately for the garnishly we pay, separately for the cover chargely we pay, separately for the service feely we are paying.

The writer who has written about this subject the mostam I.

Finally, the state put a stop to this and pressed the button to abolishthe servicefee.

The ones responsible for this are the venue owners.

I believe that both this tip and the service fee have now become athat it needs to beregulated, Ithink.

Theamount of the tip I give should be my choice.

Why in a restaurant I will paythe salary of the waiter working there.

The man will make money from the food and drinks. And I willpay the waiter'swages.

No that's how it is.

If I am satisfied with the service, I willgive a tip anyway, but when I am not satisfied with the service, whether or not to tip should be my choice.

Bring the food. Charge for the side dishon the side, charge for the cover, charge a service fee, take a tip.Just because we ate, come and also...

The venue owner should pay their waiter a propersalary.will pay, and will not deduct the waiter's salary from mypocket.

The tip a waiter receives should be their extra income, not their salary.

Venue owners have made waiters destitute and dependent ontips.

This business hasgone too far around the world. it turned out.

I wrote about America last time. Previously in America, tips were between 5 percent and 20 percentwe were making choices. Now, in America, the bill includesa 20 percent service charge, 7 percent state tax, and 2 percent city tax. What does it mean to add 29 percent on top of the bill?

The result: Restaurants there are alsoempty.

When it comes to dining,prices in Europe are more reasonable. Tipsthe tipping system is more acceptable at thatlevel.

In our country, however, both foodand drinks are soldexpensively compared to Europe.Then they charge a service fee and ask for a tip. Is my grandmother supposed to bring the food to my table? Of course, it's the waiter. What is this demand for moneyfor that?

I have never seen anyone's salary in any sectorit I am not obligated to pay.

In the past, people gave because it truly came from their hearts.Now they are taking it from our pockets by force.

Now they are taking it from our pockets by force.