A moral for stock market investors

Following the Cold War, Russia, which had disintegrated, lost its influence in the region.

After the 1990s, America and England brought the fragmented countries under the umbrella of both NATO and the EU.

Thus, the shrinking volume of the wealthy market, saturated with consumption, was expanded with an educated but needy, impoverished population.

Reaching people to sell goods produced quite cheaply through automation was no longer a problem.

The expanding sphere of trade increased the profitability of companies.

Companies grew geometrically, and the stock market also got its share of this expansion.

Those who held long-term stocks multiplied their earnings over and over.

Those who chased "pump and dump" schemes, however, were left with nothing.

I asked an economist friend of mine:

"Who were these firms that made their shareholders wealthy in the long run?"

After a short but concise analysis, an unsurprising truth emerged:

Merchants who converted their reproductive hormones into trade and had male child(ren) were the ones who truly generated wealth in the long run!

Even if the companies of those who used their testosterone sparingly grew, they were short-lived; they could not facilitate the testosterone surge that would make their shareholders happy.

Although the bankruptcies brought about by the "post-son-in-law syndrome" for businessmen with daughters might be a cheerful topic, that is a subject for another article...

A major construction firm that crashed on the stock market today, as well as massive companies that went bankrupt in the past, withdrew from commercial life for similar reasons. They were mercilessly dismantled by their sons-in-law or CEOs.