Is Zelensky a model for salvation or disintegration?

The lifespan of synthetic leaders is as short as morning dew. They are programmed not for salvation and foundation, but for destruction and disintegration. So, let us begin with the synthetic leader marketed as the expected political messiah. The same center that determines the synthetic leader, writes the script, and creates the calendar for the orange chaos is the one in charge. Although the scenario carries differences for every country and society, the main plot remains unchanged. The set chosen for the film to be shot is a city center or a nearby square large enough to accommodate hundreds of thousands, with easy access from all directions.

When the fuse of the orange chaos is lit, there is no mass reaching hundreds of thousands or millions at the start. The community directed by the core cadre will grow like an avalanche over time. Demonstrations that begin as a struggle for freedom against a corrupt, oppressive administration that the public reacts to are the first stage of the process. The hundreds of thousands who take to the square with demands for freedom, democracy, and justice are, of course, unaware of where the matter will end up.

Law enforcement that exceeds legal limits and uses disproportionate force against the demonstrations will lead not to a decrease in social tension, but to an increase. The police violence against the masses exercising their democratic rights, and the increasingly harsh polemics between the synthetic leader and those governing the country, will lead to the deepening of fault lines. The reactions that the images served from the square will create both inside and outside the country will lead to the spread of chaos throughout the nation.

Meanwhile, the polishing of the orange actor, presented to society as the leader of the future democratic administration, will be continued without interruption. The criminal past of the polished orange option, the corruption they were involved in, and the allegations against them will be hidden from the eyes of the public—who want to get rid of the tiresome despotic administration as soon as possible—by using smoke screens.

The screenwriters, who know mass psychology very well, will continue their efforts until they seat the orange actor, who will lead to the country's disintegration and collapse in the future, in the leader's chair. It will be constantly emphasized that the orange option is the indispensable choice for the transition to democracy, with an identity that has internalized the country's founding values and embraced its founding leaders.

The time interval between the seating of the orange leader and the country's collapse and disintegration will not be very long. With the activation of all centrifugal dynamics—those who hold an understanding problematic with the country's founding architecture, ethnic separatist formations waiting for the right environment, and opportunists of every era who are stateless and flagless—the inevitable end will be experienced.

The question that citizens of a country, which pushed aside the imperial prescription of the Treaty of Sèvres with the back of its hand in the last century and achieved salvation and foundation with the red-and-white option, must ask themselves is this: Is it to be dragged into disintegration and extinction with the orange option marketed as an alternative to despotic administration, or to exist forever in this geography with the red-and-white option, the accuracy of which has been tested thousands of times?