Who does the 'Founding Leader' command as the leader of the Turks?!

According to the KCK structure prepared by the terrorist leader in İmralı; “southern Kurdistan”, meaning Barzanistan, is called “Bashur”; “northern Kurdistan”, meaning our Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia, is called “Bakur”; “western Kurdistan” is called “Rojava”; and “eastern Kurdistan” is called “Rojhilat”.

The situation in Turkey is well-known; within the scope of the new opening process conducted with the terrorist leader in İmralı, it is stated that he has given instructions not only for the PKK but also for the dissolution and laying down of arms by the SDF, PJAK, and KCK. In return, a “status” is being sought for him.

There is no need to explain Barzanistan; after the US invasion of Iraq, they made the whole world accept their autonomy. Now, they are eagerly waiting for the situation to become even more chaotic to declare independence.

Regarding Syria, or “Rojava”, we know that with the vast contributions of the terrorist leader in İmralı, the SDF/YPG supposedly agreed to dissolve itself and integrate into the Damascus administration; however, let us convey what İlhan Ahmed, the right-hand man of Mazlum Kobani and the so-called co-chair of foreign relations, who met with members of the German Federal Parliament in Berlin two days ago, said. Stating that the process of integrating the SDF and YPJ forces into the new Syrian army must be in line with the spirit of the 13-year resistance, Ahmed said, “In particular, the uniqueness of the YPJ (Women's Protection Units) within the defense system must be preserved. We do not accept the desire to confine women only to security units; we are determined to remain an essential part of the army and the defense system.” He also emphasized that they are in favor of a model where “Kurds govern their own regions.”

“Rojhilat”, or “eastern Kurdistan”, and PJAK: days before the US-Israel attack on Iran, 5 Kurdish parties there united to “take advantage of this opportunity in unity during the weakest period of the Iranian regime” and brought the “right of the Kurdish people to self-determination” to the agenda. In a statement released after a party joined this group while the imperialist-Zionist alliance's attack was ongoing, the “search for status for the Kurdish people” was emphasized again, and it was said, “Down with the Islamic Republic regime, long live Kurdistan.”

What else happened before and after the US-Israel attack?

Colonial governor Tom Barrack first met with the Barzanis, then with Bafel Talabani and Mazlum Kobani in Sulaymaniyah. According to The Economist's claim, it was during these meetings that he called on “Iranian Kurds to prepare for an uprising.”

When the attacks began, “our man” Colani/Shara met with Masoud Barzani, and they reached a consensus on developments in the region. Likewise, Mazlum Kobani met with both Masoud Barzani and Masrur Barzani. In these meetings, it was emphasized that “positions must be strengthened to protect national gains and secure Kurdish rights against current regional threats.”

Following this, it was announced that Trump, through Netanyahu's initiatives, had called the Barzanis and Bafel Talabani and asked them to choose their side regarding Iran. Along with this, talk began that Trump wanted to use the “‘Kurd’ card” and that the CIA was planning to incite a civil war in Iran through PJAK.

It is obvious that just as they made the PKK/YPG/SDF their “ground force” in Syria, they are trying to set up the same scheme in Iran.

Ankara’s “PJAK” Stance

Let us look at the stance of the DEM Party, with which the AKP-MHP are walking together in the opening process, which is described as a “product of indigenous and national state wisdom,” regarding the Iranian picture.

While calling for the attacks to be stopped on only the second day, they said, “A 3rd Way is possible in Iran.” What is that “3rd Way”?

It is “all communities in Iran building a model to govern themselves”!..

We learned about “Ankara’s view” on the US and Israel’s plans to use Kurdish groups from Hande Fırat again. Ankara reportedly has “three fundamental sensitivities”: “Kurdish armed structures in the region should not get stronger. A new Kurdish belt should not be formed through the fragmentation of Iran. The PKK-PJAK line should not expand.”

The Ministry of National Defense also stated in a statement yesterday that Turkey is in favor of protecting the territorial integrity of neighboring countries, not their division, and noted the following:

“In this context, the activities of structures that fuel ethnic separatism, such as the terrorist organization PJAK, negatively affect not only Iran’s security but also the general peace and stability of the region. We are closely following the activities carried out by the terrorist organization PJAK in Iran and the developments in the region in coordination with the relevant institutions of our state.”

What we want to draw attention to is this: especially since Bahçeli made the terrorist leader in İmralı the “founding leader” with the claim that he dominates his organization and makes them listen to him, what are these PJAK-centered activities?

This means that the separatist terrorist organization has not dissolved itself and laid down its arms with all its components!..

But no worries; they are continuing the opening process at full speed with “decisive and courageous steps” and are discussing whether the legal regulations will be made before or after the holiday.

And this is while İmralı’s “Gülistan,” Gülistan Kılıç Koçyiğit, has openly confessed that the laws to be enacted will “facilitate the process of laying down arms,” meaning that no arms are being laid down at all!..

The Terrorist Leader Determined His “Status”

Amidst the war drums in the region, it did not attract attention or was overlooked, but new orders also came from the terrorist leader.

His nephew, DEM Urfa MP Ömer Öcalan, who went to İmralı two days before the attack on Iran, for some reason only announced what they talked about two days ago.

The terrorist leader made the assessment that “Iraq is gone. The current structure of Syria has disintegrated. If Iran does not democratize itself, it will face intervention. We are currently in the second phase after the 12-day war,” and then sent the message, “At this point, our people and institutions must take precautions. The cost of chauvinistic and populist approaches will be heavy for the people.”

He reported that he is closely following the developments in Rojava and that he attaches importance to the diplomacy being conducted for the Kurds in the region to stand on their own feet...

Regarding the process being conducted in Turkey, he said, “It is moving slowly, but it has created a ground that opens space for democratic politics. There is nothing we haven't said so far; now practical steps are needed... We need to get results with concrete policies now. This duty applies both to the state mechanism and to the pioneers of democratic politics who are in the field.”

He warned, “The Kurdish language is important. If the mind is fragmented, the language is also fragmented. If you do not have political power, you will not have cultural power. If you do not have organized power, you cannot keep the language alive. We must protect our own values.”

And furthermore, regarding the “status” brought to the agenda by Bahçeli, he commanded, “Of course, my status is important. Because my status is also the status of the Kurds. My exit from here is the people’s exit, the people’s exit is my exit.”

In plain Turkish, he has declared himself the “leader of the Kurds”!..

Since the project is “Turkish-Kurdish brotherhood,” don't the Turks, and even the Arabs who were later included in the equation, need a leader each? I wonder who the terrorist leader would deem appropriate?!

Will They Thwart US-Israel Plans with the Terrorist Leader?

Since the beginning of the opening, it has been said that the terrorist leader will ensure “peace and brotherhood” not only in our country but also in the Middle East, but the situation is clear.

Despite this, Bahçeli defended his project by pointing to the Iran attack as follows:

“Do those who turn up their noses at the goal of a ‘Turkey without terror’ see better what we are doing and what we are aiming for?... Do you, the mixed-breed mentalities who attack the February 27 call of the PKK’s founding leadership from every angle, draw any conclusions from the ring of fire around us?... When do you intend to understand what kind of disaster and catastrophe we have turned back from? When do you hope to see that if our internal front is shaken, our right and left will be filled with poisonous vermin?”

While he leaves those who do not share the same views with him in a miserable state, what should one call attempting to fortify the “internal front” with the terrorist leader and the PKK?!

Even more dire are the things Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on TRT Haber three days ago. While the conditions of the US-Israel, which mean “give us the title deed of Iran,” are clear, he spoke as follows:

“I believe that if the Iranians had actually read the decision pressure that President Trump is facing well and given him something beforehand, Israel’s pressure might not have been this effective.”

Alas, what a pity!.. I hope Turkey’s foreign policy is not being conducted with the understanding of “giving something to Trump beforehand.” Like starting this opening process in advance to prevent the US-Israel from designing our country and fulfilling the terrorist leader’s demands...

Müyesser YILDIZ

March 6, 2026