There are also babies left disabled in the newborn gang scandal!
Ayşe K., who gave birth at the Private Reyap Hospital in Esenyurt, which is mentioned in the 'newborn gang' investigation, claimed that her now 4-year-old son, Eymen Ali K., has a 90 percent disability due to the negligence of hospital staff. Ayşe K., who was referred to the hospital by ambulance as an emergency patient when she went into labor in 2020, stated that her son Eymen was born prematurely and remained separated from her for 57 days.
Ayşe K., a 34-year-old resident of Istanbul's Esenyurt district, went into labor in 2020. According to her claims, she was an urgent patient, but she was referred by the ambulance that arrived to the Private Reyap Hospital, which was far from their home. Eymen Ali K. was born in this hospital as a premature baby, remained separated from his mother for 57 days, and was intubated. According to the allegations, the incorrect treatment applied by hospital staff caused permanent damage to Eymen Ali K. Describing what she went through, Ayşe K. said, "I saw many babies there. They were not interested in them at all; the nurses were sitting around playing with their phones, but the children were crying there. One of them was crying until they turned blue, and the child was almost going to fall out of the incubator from crying and thrashing about."

'HE WAS VERY FLUSTERED AND WANTED TO SEND THE CHILD AWAY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE'
Describing the struggle she went through to see her baby, Ayşe K. said, "Eymen was born during the pandemic process. He was 29 weeks old, the placenta had detached, and I was a very urgent patient. We called the 112 Emergency Call Center, and an ambulance arrived. They took us to the hospital. There were two very well-equipped hospitals next to us, very close to us. They skipped those two hospitals and brought us directly to the Private Reyap Hospital. I was already rushed into surgery there. The child was taken to the neonatal intensive care unit. The doctor who delivered my baby came and spoke with me. He said he heard the child crying and that he had been taken to intensive care. He reassured me by saying the child would be fine, would recover, and there was nothing to fear because oxygen had reached him. He said they had intubated the child and that he would remain in intensive care for a long time. Two days later, I went to talk to the doctor and said I wanted to see the child. They told me they 'could not show the child.' I insisted that I needed to see the child because I am his mother and I want to see my child. I asked for a photo, at least to see what my child looked like, saying I want to see my child, this is my right... They said they would give me a photo the next day, and the next day I was given a photo taken in the intensive care unit. We could not get any information about the child. Every time he called us, he said the treatment was continuing and there was no new development. The child did not have any complications in intensive care and remained intubated for 57 days. Fırat Sarı called us to the hospital in a rush. What he told us was, 'Nurse Yeşim aspirated milk into Eymen's lungs while feeding him, the baby was aspirated, and I want to transfer him'... He was very flustered. He wanted to send the child away as soon as possible. I was surprised, why do you want to transfer us... He told me it was a 'nurse error' and that he was angry at the nurse. I didn't even know what aspiration meant. What did the child experience there? The child was left without oxygen there. During that time, I have learned now, I understand what happened. They had pulled the formula, or milk, whatever it was, back out of the child's lungs using the aspiration method. They started calling me in toward the end of Eymen Ali's stay, unable to withstand my insistence and intense pressure. It was the end of the 4th month, the discharge time had come, and they started letting me inside," she said.

'THE CHILD WAS SCRATCHING ME FROM HUNGER'
Seeing baby Eymen months later, mother Ayşe K. stated, "I saw that Eymen was very neglected; they were not interested in any way, and there were other babies there too. I wanted to have skin-to-skin contact with Eymen, and I was constantly requesting this. They could no longer remain indifferent to how demanding I was, and they were calling me, but they only started calling me toward the end of the discharge, at the end of the 4th month. When I took the baby into my arms, the child was scratching me from hunger. I started to feed and breastfeed the child. The child was so hungry that he started sucking immediately; we are talking about a premature baby. A baby whose sucking reflex had not developed... A baby who had remained intubated for a long time started sucking. That's how hungry they must have left the child there," she said.
'EYMEN IS 90 PERCENT DISABLED AND THEY CAUSED THIS'
Ayşe K. said, "Eymen was aspirated twice there, and currently, it is not written in the epicrisis report they wrote that Eymen was aspirated. This information is missing. The child was aspirated twice there, and his lungs were damaged. Eymen will pay the price for what he experienced. Eymen is currently over 90 percent disabled, and they caused this. Perhaps if the aspiration process had not happened, Eymen would be continuing his life as a healthy child today. Because I have seen many children who were born at 26-27 weeks and continued their lives. They cannot attribute this to prematurity. There are many children who were born premature and completed their development. They caused this, especially Nurse Yeşim while feeding him. It is very clear that there was negligence. The child vomited, and the vomit went back into his lungs. The child remained in this state for a long time. The child returned from the brink of death twice. They did not contribute anything to Eymen here. This was Eymen's struggle, and Eymen won this alone. I always had a doubt inside me, I always had a suspicion, and there are people I have told this to many times. While watching these, they will definitely say, 'Yes, she had said so,'" she said.

'I WITNESSED FIRAT SARI'S PHONE CONVERSATION'
Stating that her suspicion never ended, Ayşe K. said, "Once, when I went for a check-up, I witnessed a phone conversation of Fırat Sarı. A family was going to file a complaint against him. I witnessed them talking about this, saying, 'They cannot prove anything, we are the ones who prepare the report. The child's condition is obvious. Let them do their worst; our hands are not empty either, they can do whatever they want.' I want them to be punished in the most severe way. Their diplomas should definitely be revoked, these people should never get out of prison. If I had gone to a state hospital, if I had gone to a research hospital, if I had gone to another hospital at that moment, if I had encountered people who did their jobs well, Eymen might be in a different situation today," she said.

'WE BOUGHT MANY MEDICINES AT THAT TIME, FIRAT SARI AND HIS NURSES REQUESTED THEM'
Ayşe K. stated, "They demanded about 3,500 TL for bed fees from us at that time. When my mother-in-law and my husband said it was a very high amount and we would not pay it, they lowered it to 2,000 TL. They did not issue an invoice. Certain medicines were requested; we bought and gave many medicines at that time. Fırat Sarı and his nurses requested the medicines from us. We took medicine to them many times. We ourselves procured and took the medicines that he said he would give to the child, vitamins, and other medicines that I cannot think of right now," she said.
News Source: 12punto
Most Read
Striking picture for Özgür Özel's 'New Party'
The PKK opening and Özgür Özel’s path!..
How did the newspapers view Özgür Özel's farewell to the CHP?
He killed his wife by slitting her throat: Their children witnessed the moments
What did the CHP do?
Özel’s new party move in the world press
Fire at TUSAŞ engine factory in Eskişehir under control
The New CHP, against CEHAPE
From self-efficacy to despair
Kılıçdaroğlu's first message on Özgür Özel's new party announcement