According to the Court of Cassation, saying 'I don't love you' is grounds for divorce
The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation has found a woman at fault in a divorce case for telling her husband, 'I don't love you, my love is gone.' The Chamber overturned the local court's decision, which had found only the husband at fault.
A young couple experiencing severe incompatibility applied to the Family Court to end their marriage. In the case where both parties requested a divorce, the court found the husband, who was determined to have committed violence against his spouse, to be at fault. The court accepted the woman's lawsuit and decided to divorce the couple, while rejecting the husband's lawsuit.
Upon the appeal of the decision, the file came before the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation.
WOMAN ALSO FOUND AT FAULT
Reviewing the file, the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation ruled unanimously that the woman was also at fault for the breakdown of the marital union.
The following assessment was included in the decision:
"In the events leading to the breakdown of the marital union, the defendant-counter-plaintiff husband was found to be fully at fault by the court, and the husband's divorce case was rejected, while the woman's case was accepted and a divorce was granted. Based on the trial and the evidence collected, it is understood that the plaintiff-counter-defendant woman humiliated her husband in front of others by saying, 'I am babysitting, we are looking after the child,' and stated, 'I do not love my husband, my love is gone.' Given this situation, the husband is also justified in filing for divorce. Therefore, while the husband's case should also have been accepted and a divorce granted, the rejection of his case was not correct and required reversal."
LOCAL COURT DECISION OVERTURNED
The Court of Cassation evaluated the woman's use of belittling expressions about her husband in front of others and her statement, 'I do not love my husband, my love is gone,' as a fault. For this reason, the Chamber concluded that the husband was also justified in filing for divorce and overturned the local court's decision.
It was noted that the decision could be considered a precedent in similar divorce cases, and it was met with differing opinions in the public sphere.
News Source: İHA
Most Read
Striking picture for Özgür Özel's 'New Party'
The PKK opening and Özgür Özel’s path!..
How did the newspapers view Özgür Özel's farewell to the CHP?
He killed his wife by slitting her throat: Their children witnessed the moments
What did the CHP do?
Özel’s new party move in the world press
The New CHP, against CEHAPE
Fire at TUSAŞ engine factory in Eskişehir under control
From self-efficacy to despair
Kılıçdaroğlu's first message on Özgür Özel's new party announcement