Find news published in the date range below
and and
and and
and and
Clear
Euro
Arrow
53,9623
Dollar
Arrow
44,7367
Sterling
Arrow
63,0385
Gold
Arrow
6274,3426
BIST 100
Arrow
10.729

Court of Cassation holds illiterate person responsible for signature

The 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation has ruled that an illiterate person who signed a loan agreement as a guarantor cannot be assumed to be unaware of the contract's content and is therefore liable for the debt.

Don't leave your news choices to an algorithm - decide for yourself what you read. Add 12punto to your preferred sources!
Court of Cassation holds illiterate person responsible for signature

An illiterate person acted as a guarantor for a relative who took out a bank loan and signed the guarantee document. When the borrower failed to repay the debt, the bank initiated enforcement proceedings against the guarantor.

Following the guarantor's objection to the debt on the grounds that they were illiterate, the bank filed a lawsuit against the guarantor.

The local court hearing the case requested the guarantor's educational records from the Kumluca District Directorate of National Education. Upon finding no records, the court dismissed the case on the grounds that a person who cannot read or write would not know the content of the document they signed.

COURT OF CASSATION OVERTURNS THE DECISION

Reviewing the file upon appeal, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation overturned the local court's decision.

FROM THE RATIONALE OF THE DECISION

The Chamber's decision stated that the guarantor did not deny signing the relevant document but argued that they were unaware of its content.

Noting that a signature serves as an identifier that reveals a person's identity and distinguishes them from others, the decision included the finding that: "A signature definitively expresses, completes, and reveals the intent to assume an obligation and, in particular, the intent to declare."

The decision stated that those who cannot read or write may use a fingerprint or a handwritten mark instead of a signature, and added the following:

"If an illiterate person uses a signature, they can enter into a contract and assume an obligation with that signature. Even if it is accepted that the defendant is illiterate, this situation alone does not result in the invalidity of the contract, nor can it be accepted solely for this reason that they were unaware of the content of the contract they signed. The signature, which is not in doubt to belong to the defendant, is sufficient for the establishment of the contract and for the defendant to assume the debt."


News Source: AA

Court of Cassation