The Trio team has the final word: They evaluated the notable moment in the Fenerbahçe-Göztepe match

What is your comment on the position between Szymanski and Nielsen in the 9th minute? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "From the first minute, Nielsen was the faulty party in that matchup. He hit the ball, yes, but did he create a lack of control regarding his opponent while hitting the ball? I think his studs came near the shoulder area. There is contact, but I saw that it was not contact that would require a yellow card. I couldn't catch anything extra." | 

Deniz Çoban: "A foul could perhaps be given. The player swung his foot at the ball. The red sock is also bending to avoid it. It can also be called unavoidable contact. He is avoiding contact. I cannot criticize the referee's decision here. However, I can criticize this: Szymanski holding his head without there being a blow to his head." | 

Bahattin Duran: "After Nielsen hit the ball, his studs came to the back area. But I didn't see the ear area either. It clearly came. The referee could have given a foul for this."

Should a card have been issued for Nielsen's intervention on Szymanski in the 14th minute? | 

Deniz Çoban: "The foul is correct here. There is a delayed move. We don't think about a yellow card, but it is good that the referee is aware of this matchup and warns him." | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "The foul is sufficient. There is a very small contact. The general warning he gave to Nielsen, indicating that the referee is also aware of this matchup, is correct." | 

Bahattin Duran: "I am of the same opinion as you."

Was a card necessary in the Nielsen-Szymanski struggle in the 19th minute? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "Now the referee needs to use his yellow card here. You gave a personal warning, you gave a general warning. Szymanski has saved the ball and is going. It is a foul against sportsmanship. Otherwise, I am not talking about an uncontrolled foul. However, I think it is against sportsmanship due to constant violation of the rules of the game and I think he should see a yellow card." | 

Deniz Çoban: "Great minds think alike." | 

Bahattin Duran: "Inappropriate use of the hand. He doesn't come and hit him in the face, but there is a foul he committed with his hand. After giving a warning, the referee did not show a yellow card. For me, this position would now be a yellow card."

Is the yellow card Miroshi received correct? | 

Deniz Çoban: "We also talked about it in the Sivasspor match. He didn't show it yesterday. Here the referee shows it. This is the correct one. If you asked me about the story of this week in terms of referees, I would say it was the inconsistent decisions of the referees in different matches of the same week." | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "A correct yellow card. If he had let go and left, it would be fine, but he persists." | 

Bahattin Duran: "For me, it is also a correct yellow card. A clear yellow card."

Is there a foul in the Szymanski-Nielsen position before Göztepe's goal? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "Szymanski remained on the ground in front of the assistant. It continued. We will look at that. I don't think there is a foul. They rose first. The Göztepe player rose better and hit the ball. Although Szymanski, who is weaker and late, played with the ball, there is no foul by Nielsen here." | 

Deniz Çoban: "There is no foul."Bahattin Duran: "For me, there is no violation before Göztepe's goal either. The goal is legitimate."

Would a card be issued for the foul committed on Dzeko in the 33rd minute? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "A card is needed here. With the second complementary movement, he used his arm uncontrollably and hit Dzeko with an extra movement. This position is a foul against sportsmanship. It would require a yellow card." | 

Deniz Çoban: "For me, it is both an act against sportsmanship and uncontrolled. Both are present. A clear yellow card." | 

Bahattin Duran: "It is not a position that will pass without a yellow card. A very clear yellow card. A clear yellow card was missed."

Is there an intervention by Oğuz on his opponent in the 34th minute, is the foul decision correct? | 

Deniz Çoban: "Again, the assistant referee is helping. I don't think he influenced it, but that's my opinion. The assistant referee can call a foul. I cannot object to that." | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "I agree. I don't think there is an effective push. However, since the assistant referee had a front-to-back position, he raised his flag for a foul. There is nothing to do." | 

Bahattin Duran: "I think it was a bit simple too. He put his hand on him, but the player who felt the hand let go immediately. Offensive fouls are given easily."

Is Romulo offside in the 36th minute, would there be an obvious goal chance in the continuing position? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "He is physically closer to the opponent's goal. If this ball comes directly, it is offside. Then Djiku made a header that looked controlled but, because it was a side ball and at a distance, he leaned sideways, which I think was not intentionally controlled and is open to interpretation. That's why I think the offside flag raised is correct. If it weren't offside, there is a push from behind in the continuing position. It would be a foul and a yellow card for stopping a promising attack." | 

Deniz Çoban: "This is not a controlled intentional play. Offside is correct. It is a position going towards the throw-in. There is a player who will enter his cover. Even if it weren't offside, there wouldn't be an obvious goal chance." | 

Minute 39, is Djalma preventing Dzeko from taking a quick free kick? | 

Deniz Çoban: "There are some issues. I don't understand a FIFA referee on the field trying to manage these. Referees are asked to save on cards, but these are not those. There is free kick management. If a player wants to take a free kick quickly, if the player who is closer than 9.15 has not found time to open up, if he remains motionless where he is and is not trying to prevent the free kick, the referee continues the game. However, a player who comes running in front of the ball while the intention is to use it quickly, and tries to prevent it by opening his foot left and right while the free kick is being taken, is guilty of unsportsmanlike conduct and is punished with a yellow card. He is both coming from afar and preventing it while opening his foot. A yellow card right from the middle of the book." | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "A clear yellow card. He is actively preventing the game from starting quickly. The free kick needs to be retaken and he needs to see a yellow card." | 

Bahattin Duran: "The players are also aware. A clear yellow card."

Would a card have been issued for Djalma's intervention on Oğuz? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "There is one thing we always say, having played with the ball does not eliminate your responsibility for the consequences of the move. After hitting the ball, when there was a chance to shrink more, yes, his goal was not to hit, and Oğuz had accelerated towards there. I say yellow card. If this foot he extended came to his opponent's face, it would be a red card. In this state, a yellow card is definitely required. You cannot leave your foot there just because I hit the ball." | 

Deniz Çoban: "The assistant referee made him give it. Sir, in this move, the player is coming, the foot is going. They invented something like 'this raised foot will come down'. It is on the IFAB page. The player is responsible for his moves after playing with the ball. I accept the expression there as correct. Minimum foul. I think it's a yellow card, but the game continues." | 

Bahattin Duran: "Can he pull his foot after hitting the ball, is he in an effort to pull it? This is a yellow card."

Should a card have been issued for Nielsen's intervention on Szymanski in the 48th minute? |

Bülent Yıldırım: "Sir, what else will happen? Independent of the foul itself, a yellow card for constant violation of the rules of the game."Deniz Çoban: "Let it be a yellow card here now. How many times will the same player commit a foul on the same player?" | 

Bahattin Duran: "Nielsen definitely needed to see a yellow card. Would it be a second yellow card?" | 

Deniz Çoban: "It wouldn't be a second yellow card."Bahattin Duran: "A yellow card in the story of the match."

Is the yellow card Dennis received in the 49th minute correct? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "Sir, this was also wrong. There is no uncontrolled foul, no tactical foul, and no prevention of a promising attack. A foul committed in a blind spot, an intervention on Szymanski's shoulder, such a yellow card cannot be." | 

Deniz Çoban: "We can discuss the foul. A card doesn't even come to my mind." | 

Bahattin Duran: "I couldn't fit it into any of the items for which a yellow card would be shown. For me, it was also a wrong yellow card."

Is there a foul before Oğuz Aydın's goal? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "If there is a foul here. If there is a black-and-white quality foul, the VAR referee could have intervened in this. What happened here? While Çağlar is taking the ball, a small contact occurs. There is an image of the tip of his stud on the opponent's stud. I made my assessment regarding the attack phase, I think it is inside. I don't think there is an intervention that requires a VAR referee intervention. My discretion here is that there is no foul. I think the referee's decision is correct. I don't think there is a foul. Why did Çağlar bend this foot, to step on it, or not to step on it?" | 

Deniz Çoban: "It is at the referee's discretion. I don't think VAR would interfere, but I think this contact is a foul. He is stepping on the support foot on the ground here with the tip of his stud. I think it's a foul. According to Bülent Sir, it is not. That's why VAR doesn't interfere. I say it's a foul. I can never criticize the referee for such a position. Due to the shape of the position, it is not a position that will be caught very easily." | 

Bahattin Duran: "I also think the tip of his foot gets caught, but I also don't think it's a foul. The decision to continue is correct. They explained that even if a foul came out, a VAR intervention would not come out. I find the decision to continue correct. I think the goal is legitimate."

Is Oğuz Aydın's yellow card in the 90th minute sufficient? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "Indisputably correct. More is not needed." | 

Deniz Çoban: "Indisputably." | 

Bahattin Duran: "A very clear yellow card".

What is your comment on Göztepe's throw-in from the last minutes? | 

Deniz Çoban: "The referee insists from beginning to end, also by blowing the whistle, that you will throw it from here, not from there. He blows the whistle. The rules of the game are very clear. This position, the last minutes of the game, he makes the same team use it again, if it were a position and a goal, it would be talked about for a whole season. Why don't they apply the rule when it is so clear? | 

Bülent Yıldırım: "He took a very wrong risk here. He should have given the ball to Fenerbahçe here."