Home > Current Affairs News > AKP's Şamil Tayyar had said 'There is a more well-known name than Ersoy': A new statement has arrived

AKP's Şamil Tayyar had said 'There is a more well-known name than Ersoy': A new statement has arrived

A new post has come from AKP's Tayyar, who used the phrase 'a more well-known name than Mehmet Akif Ersoy.' Tayyar said, 'The answer is in the secret witness testimony. Tomorrow, these transcripts will enter the file, become public knowledge, and everyone will find out.'

12punto

AKP's Şamil Tayyar pointed to a person whose name was mentioned in witness testimonies regarding the drug operation conducted against famous names in the media world and said the following:

"There is someone against whom there are more serious allegations than any allegations regarding Mehmet Akif Ersoy, but no action has been taken against them. I don't know if their name will come out in time. Let me not give details. Perhaps the investigation is still ongoing. Their name is mentioned regarding drug use, complex allegations, groups, etc.

No action was taken. I don't know if this happened due to political pressure or if it wasn't done because the investigation is ongoing. They are a recognized, well-known person. I will follow this. I will look into it in the future. Everything is clearly explained in the testimony of the secret witness codenamed 'Canary'.

If there is a fight against drugs, if there is a fight against these crimes, action must be taken against people who have serious accusations against them at least as much as Ersoy. If it is not done, then that means there is a political operation."

Tayyar made a new statement via his social media account. The statement is as follows:

I have experienced very heavy phone traffic since last night. I could not answer a significant portion of them. The common question was: Who is this?

Since the first day, I have not gone into the content of the file based on the presumption of innocence, and I will not do so again.

I have not accused anyone with a wholesale approach; I hoped that these people who are role models for society were innocent.

My objection here is to the privilege of certain individuals.

While blood and hair samples are being taken from those with relatively fewer allegations against them, the fact that the person in question is exempted even from this test, let alone being taken into custody, is in need of explanation.

Because our President has given the green light to pursue all kinds of allegations, no matter who they touch.

No one is untouchable.

To return to the question, the answer is in the secret witness testimony.

Tomorrow, these transcripts will enter the file, become public knowledge, and everyone will find out.

When action is taken months later, won't the reasonable time valid for the test have passed?

What is the point of being subjected to a test after drug residue has been cleared from the body?

I advise this person, whose name will somehow become public knowledge tomorrow, to voluntarily take a drug test now, so as not to remain under suspicion. If they think they are innocent…”