Home > Current Affairs News > Backlash against Trabzon Metropolitan Mayor Ahmet Metin Genç over 'jersey money': Whose pocket did 29 million liras come from?

Backlash against Trabzon Metropolitan Mayor Ahmet Metin Genç over 'jersey money': Whose pocket did 29 million liras come from?

The purchase of a large number of Trabzonspor jerseys by Trabzon Metropolitan Mayor Ahmet Metin Genç, as shown in a video he shared, has sparked public debate. Calculations regarding the cost of the purchased jerseys have gained significant traction on social media, while comparisons have been drawn to recent investigations and detentions involving lower-amount expenditures in other municipalities.

12punto

After announcing that he had purchased 6,661 jerseys following the Mohamed Salah transfer and launching a campaign, Trabzon Metropolitan Mayor Ahmet Metin Genç faced questions from social media users regarding whose money was used to pay for the jerseys.

At the center of the controversy were calculations based on current Trabzonspor jersey retail prices. 

Given that the price of the jersey in question is 4,499.99 liras, the calculation that purchasing 6,661 units would cost 29 million 974 thousand 433 liras caused public outrage to grow rapidly.

'Double standard' debate on social media

Criticism regarding the jersey purchase was not limited to the size of the expenditure. Social media users and opposition representatives brought up allegations of a "double standard," pointing to recent investigations launched against various municipalities over significantly smaller expenditures or tender processes.

Some social media users expressed their reactions regarding the jersey purchase with the following questions: 

"Did he pay for this from his own account? If he paid from his own account, we need to look at his latest asset declaration.

If he paid from the municipal budget, on what grounds? If he had the contractors who won tenders pay for it, that raises an entirely different issue." they questioned.

They even called on authorized officials to investigate the matter.

The public debate has reignited discussions not only about transparency and accountability in municipal spending but also about whether public institutions and the judiciary apply the same standards to similar incidents.