Suspicions deepen in Narin's death: X user draws attention to activity in footage

The trial process has begun following the incident in which 8-year-old Narin was brutally murdered in Diyarbakır. The Dara footage, released in recent days, has now been entered into the investigation file. Following the addition of the footage to the file, the debate has entered a completely different phase.

Appearing on the Nokta Atışı program hosted by İpek Özbey on SÖZCÜ Television, a person using the social media platform X under the name Efsome connected to the broadcast to explain their work on the footage and the details they reached.

'I AM JUST A CITIZEN'

Actually, I am not an expert in anything. As just a citizen, I internalized and followed this issue at home like everyone else. When I put together all the programs I watched, I thought we had some evidence after this footage was released. I personally deal with graphic design and artificial intelligence at home.

Honestly, after the footage arrived, I started working on it myself by coloring it in different ways, adding shadows, and increasing the sharpness. I realized that something was happening. There were movements. Then I captured some images that would focus on the moment of the incident. In the last image I shared, the path led me somewhere else.

We all see the village from across the way. We say, there was a school, she climbed the hill, saw something, and was murdered. This must have a background. When it comes to Dara, it sees a very wide area. I did some work to make the red color stand out when I started to clarify the images. The pixels of the Dara footage are very low. There are significant distances as the crow flies.

'I REALIZED THERE WAS ACTIVITY'

The pixel quality degrades as the image zooms in, but there is a road coming from the ring road on the left and right. There is an arrival from there. When you examine the vehicle movements during the hours of the incident, there is tremendous activity in the village. When combined with the testimonies, this movement should not be there. Everyone's testimony claims that no one was in the village, but what is this movement?

'THE RED VEHICLE IS MOVING AROUND FREELY'

There is a red vehicle. It is moving around freely. There is footage of that vehicle heading toward the Diyarbakır ring road. There is a blurriness in the raw footage. After making some adjustments, I started to see where the red vehicle was going. I followed it. I can see this car for quite a distance by tracking it. The image gets distorted as you zoom in, but we can see the vehicle's movement.

In this footage, there is an area where cars come and wait. There is a cluster of vehicles. We see the vehicles waiting there and then someone running down the path. This is where I started tracking the red car. There is a path toward the field here. Behind it is the Diyarbakır ring road. While tracking, there is Nevzat's testimony about meeting somewhere.

'THE FOOTAGE IS CONSISTENT WITH NEVZAT'S TESTIMONY'

Here, right at the intersection of the road, we see the white and red vehicles coming one after the other. They are coming from the field and stop right at the intersection. This time interval is 15:42, I believe. At that intersection, there is a red vehicle with a white vehicle behind it. This confirms Nevzat's first testimony. If the Dara footage is 6 minutes and 45 seconds ahead, this footage is consistent with Nevzat's testimony. This time, these are things that would invalidate the base station analysis.

When you expand it much further, we can track those vehicles backward. There is a house in this footage. I think it is very important. There is also tremendous activity at that house. There are many people entering and leaving that house. There are 8-10 people in that area. When I say the base station analysis is invalidated, this is what I am thinking.

There is a place my lawyers mentioned regarding Salim. The footage I see does not match what they are talking about. The base station analysis says the situation between Salim and Nevzat is consistent between 15:10 and 15:40. The question I am asking is: from whom did the report come that the Dara clock was 6 minutes and 45 seconds ahead? I am curious about this question. What did they do for 7 minutes at the tree, how many people were there, 8 or 6? I think there were more because there are also people entering and leaving from the back of the house. We see the red vehicle passing to the back.

'IS THERE NO TUBITAK IN THIS COUNTRY?'

We see the white vehicle coming from behind. The question we need to ask is whether the Dara times are really 6 minutes ahead or 6 hours ahead. When I released the footage, on the night of the 21st, a day later, a request came from the court panel to send the footage to the National Criminal Bureau. If you read that request, it asks for exactly the same things as my footage. The real question is why are we sending the footage to a private institution? Is there no TUBITAK, are there no state institutions? What report came from the Van Gendarmerie on this matter?