Home > Current Affairs News > How Akın Gürlek was appointed to Eti Maden's company in Luxembourg: Yavuzyılmaz explains step by step

How Akın Gürlek was appointed to Eti Maden's company in Luxembourg: Yavuzyılmaz explains step by step

CHP Deputy Chairman Deniz Yavuzyılmaz continues to make striking statements about Chief Public Prosecutor Akın Gürlek through posts on his social media account. This time, Yavuzyılmaz explained the process of how Gürlek was appointed to the company where he works.

12punto

CHP Chairman Özel's statements regarding Chief Public Prosecutor Akın Gürlek during a rally in Ümraniye have stirred the political agenda.

While AKP figures have expressed their reactions through consecutive posts, CHP figures continue to make new posts regarding Chief Public Prosecutor Gürlek, who is conducting the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (İBB) investigation.

CHP Deputy Chairman Yavuzyılmaz had first asked what important decisions Chief Public Prosecutor Akın Gürlek had signed off on at the company where he works.

This time, Yavuzyılmaz made noteworthy posts regarding the process of Gürlek's appointment to the company where he works.

HERE ARE THOSE LINES FROM YAVUZYILMAZ:

The mask has fallen!

Who appointed Akın Gürlek to Eti Maden's company in Luxembourg illegally while he was serving as the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor?

Let's move toward the answer step by step

First of all, the General Directorate of Eti Maden Operations is a state institution.

The institution has 2 companies abroad.

Etimine SA (Luxembourg), AB Eti Products OY (Finland).

Etimine SA also has 3 subsidiaries.

Etimine USA (USA), Shanghai Etimaden (China), Asia Pacific (Hong Kong)

Eti Maden, along with all these companies, was transferred to the Wealth Fund on January 23, 2017.

So, who is the chairman of the board of the Wealth Fund?

Tayyip Erdoğan!

In this case, with whose knowledge and under whose patronage was Akın Gürlek illegally appointed to Etimine SA in Luxembourg?

Tayyip Erdoğan!

It has been revealed with documentation that a member of the judiciary in this situation cannot conduct an investigation independently of the executive branch (AKP).

The mask has fallen!