Murat Ongun points to the IMM indictment and asks: What happened to this fraudster?

Murat Ongun, who was arrested within the scope of the investigations conducted into the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM), raised a striking question based on the prepared indictment.

12punto

In the thousands of pages of the indictment, there is no information regarding the accusations directed at him.ni stating that Ongun, Cem Küçük'ün programme and the accusations directedathim.screen footage from a program regarding theallegati Hestated thefollowingwordsregarding it:

"WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS FRAUDSTER?

TheCelal Çakmak.

In the IMM investigation, there was the phrasealleged”.

He said, “Murat Ongun demanded a 20 million bribe from me, and I gave him 5 million.I have the audio recording.”

However, this documented (!) accusationis NOT in the indictment!

Because Celal Çakmak turned outto be afraudster. Moreover, for defraudingsomeonetargeted the chiefprosecutors.I fileda lawsuit

against the professional fraudsterwho called the chief prosecutorsposing as an embassyofficial.am. What I am curious about is; did the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office file a public lawsuitornot? And the others...

The crimecommitted requires the filing of a public lawsuit without the need for anycomplaint.Or is it still, as written in the police report, stillIs theperson in the job, meaning the victim?

Is the fraudster slanderertheperson in the job, or am I thesuspect.

A meaningful(!) excerpt from the IMM investigation."