PFDK hands Mert Hakan Yandaş a 3-match ban

The Professional Football Disciplinary Board (PFDK) has handed Fenerbahçe player Mert Hakan Yandaş a 3-match ban due to his insults directed at opposing team members during the Galatasaray derby.

12punto

The decisions made by the PFDK following today's meeting are as follows:

"1- Regarding the Kocaelispor Club, during the Kocaelispor-Gençlerbirliği match played on 28.11.2025 in the Trendyol Süper Lig Mehmet Ali YYılmaz Season match during which, due to the ugly and improper chanting caused by their fans, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDT accordingly those engaging in ugly and improper chanting in the east marathon upper stand 301-302-327, eastof the marathon lower stand126, south goal behindlower standnumbered 207-208by blocking the electronic tickets of the spectators in the blocks, for the next home clubmatch they areinentry to the competitionthe obstruction of their duties,

In the samematch, Kocaelispor Club was fined 120,000 TL in accordance with Article 49/3 of the FDT due to the stairaisles not being kept clear,

2-Çaykur Rizespor, regarding the Çaykur Rizespor-Kayserispor Trendyol Süper Lig Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season matchdue to the actions of their fans for ugly and improper chanting, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDTand for those who engaged in ugly and improper chanting in the coveredsea standblock A, the electronic tickets of the spectatorswill be blocked for the next home match of the clubit was decidedpreventing theirentry to thematch,

3- Kayserispor Club,during the Çaykur Rizespor - Kayserispor Trendyol Süper Lig Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Seasonmatch played onNovember 29, 2025,due to the actions of its fans in accordance with Article 53/3 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT) due to ugly and improper chantsit was decided that the electronic tickets of the spectators located in the guest blocks who engaged in ugly and improper chantingshall be blocked, thereby preventing their entryto the nextaway matchin which their clubparticipates.

4-Gaziantep Football Clubwas sanctioned for the match played on 29.11.2025 between Gaziantep Football Club and Eyüpspor in the Trendyol Süper League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season,due tothe ugly and offensive chanting caused by its fans, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDT, resulting ina penalty for the south stand where the ugly and offensive chanting took place.the lower standby blocking the electronic tickets of spectators located in block Ethereby preventing their entry to the next home matchof the clubin whichthey arethe subject,

5- EyEyüpspor Club technical director Orhan Akwas handed a 3-match ban from officialmatches following the Gaziantep Football Club- Eyüpspor Trendyol Süper League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season matchplayed on November 29, 2025, due tohis insults directed at the match referee, in accordance with articles 41/1-c and 35/4 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT)and a fine.a ban from entering the locker roomand the substitute benchas well asa ban from entering and a fine of 80,000 TL,

6- Antalyaspor Club's,during the Antalyaspor-Göztepe Trendyol Süper Lig Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season match played on 30.11.2025in the match, due to field incidents caused by its fans, it was decided to impose a fine of 220,000 TL in accordance with Articles 52/2 and 46/1 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT),

7-GGöztepe, regarding the Antalyaspor-Göztepe Trendyol Süper League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season matchplayed on 30.11.2025, due to the failure to act in accordance with the time schedule,it was decided to impose a fine of 220,000 TL in accordance with Article 46/1 of the FDT due to non-compliance with the instructions,

In the same match, Göztepe, due to its fans' ugly and improper chanting, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT), was sanctioned by blocking the electronic tickets of spectators located in the south guest 2nd tier stand, block A2, who engaged in the ugly and improper chanting, for the next away match was the result.their entryto the matchbeing prevented,

8- Beşiktaş, regarding the Fatih Karagümrük-Beşiktaş Trendyol Süper Lig Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season min the match,due to the ugly and improper chants caused by their fans, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDT,it was decided to block the electronic tickets of the spectators located in the south guest stand, block number 329, who engaged inugly and improper chanting, thereby preventing them from attending the next awaymatch of theclub.preventing entry to thematch,

9- Samsunspor athlete Josafat Wooding Mendes, during the Samsunspor - Corendon Alanyaspor Trendyol Super League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season match,during the match assistassistant referee, for hisunsportsmanlike conduct involving physical interferencein accordance with Articles 36/5-a and 35/4 of the FDT, he is suspended for 3 officialmatches and fined 80,000 TL,to be penalized accordingly,

10- Corendon Alanyaspor Clubcoach Joao Pereira,during the Samsunspor - Corendon Alanyaspor Trendyol Süper League match played on 01.12.2025Süper Lig Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season match, during the match, for unsportsmanlike conduct towards the match referee, in accordance with articles 36/1-c and 35/4 of the FDT, he is banned for 1 official match from entering the locker room and the benchentry ban to thestadium and a fine of 80,000 TL,

11-Fenerbahçe, for the Fenerbahçe-Galatasaray Trendyol Süper League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season matchplayed on 01.12.2025, due to the ugly and bad chants caused by its fans, in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDTresulting in the blocking of electronic tickets for spectators in Spor Toto Stand C, D, E, K, L, M, North Stand C, D, E, K, L, M, Marathon Upper Stand D, E, F, G, and Marathon Lower Stand A blocks who engaged in ugly and offensive chanting,thereby preventing their entryto the next home matchin which theirclub is involved,and for the same match,

in the sameIn the match, Fenerbahçe was fined3,000,000 TL in total, at the discretion of the board, in accordance with Articles 52/2 and 46/1 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT) due to field incidents caused by its fans. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 52/3 of the FDT, it was decided to block the electronic tickets of spectators located in the Marathon Lower B block, who were involved in the field incidents, for the next home matchthey area part of, preventing their entryto the match,

In the samematch, Fenerbahçe, regarding the events that took place before the matchfor failing to display the league title sponsor's flag during the ceremony, in violation of the instructions, it was decided to impose a discretionary fine of 220,000 TL in accordance with Article 46/1 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT),

In the samematch, for Fenerbahçe's installation of aprivate sound system in the stadium outside of theannouncement system, in violation of the instructions, it was decided to impose a discretionary fine of 440,000 TL in accordance with Article 46/1 of the FDT,

In the samematch, Fenerbahçe official Ali Bozanfor his unsportsmanlike conduct, in accordance with Article 36/1-c of the FDT, a 15-day ban from all football-related activitieswas imposed,

In the samematch, Fenerbahçe athlete Mert Hakan Yandaş was sanctioned for his insults directedat opposing team members, in accordance with Articles 41/1-a and 35/4 of the FDT,with a 3-official msuspension from the match and a fine of 120,000 TLto be penalized with,

12- Galatasaray, for the Fenerbahçe - Galatasaray Trendyol Süper League Mehmet Ali Yılmaz Season matchplayed on 01.12.2025, due to the ugly and bad chants caused by their fans, and because this action was the samefor the6th time in a seasonin a matchwhere they were the visiting club,it was decided to impose a fine of 640,000 TL in accordance with Article 53/2 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT), and in accordance with Article 53/3 of the FDT, the electronic tickets of the spectators located in the G, O, and H blocks of the visiting stand, who engaged in ugly and improper chanting,shall be blocked for the next match in which they are the visitingclub.their entryto the matchbeing prevented,

In the samematch, Galatasaraywas fined 660,000 TL in total, at the discretion of the committee, due to field incidents caused by its fans, in accordance with Articles 52/2 and 46/1 of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT); and in accordance with Article 52/3 of the FDT, the visiting tribune G block, where the fans involved in the field incidents were located, will have their electronic ticketcards blocked, preventing them from attending the next away match of the clubwas blockedtheir entry to the matchbeing prevented,

it was stated that the guest tribune G block entry of spectators whose cards within the scope of electronic tickets were blocked due to 2 different actions in articles 1 and 2, for a total of the following 2 guest clubsin the matchbeing blocked,

Galatasaray executive Metin Öztürk, following the matchdue to his statements made to the media that were deemed to damage the reputation of football and institutions,in accordance withArticle 38/1-a of the Football Disciplinary Instructions (FDT), he is to be punished with a 15-dayban from football-related activities and a fine of 2,000,000 TL,(by votemultipleof)

Galatasaray coachSerhat Doğan, for unsportsmanlike conduct, in accordance with Article 36/1-c of the FDT, to a 15-day ban from all football-related activitiesto be penalized with,

13- Regarding Beşiktaş, on 26.11.2025, the ClubRegarding the statements made on the club's official social media account(X) that were deemed to damage the reputation of football and the institutions,a referral was made to our Board; however, it was decided that there was no groundsfor imposing a penalty, (by majority vote).Regarding Beşiktaş President Serdal Adalı,on the date of 26.11.2025, the club

official social media accountRegarding the statements made on the club's official social media accountregarding the post made on (X) for 'Statements Damaging the Reputation of Football and Institutions',it was referred to our board; however,it was decided that there were no grounds for imposing a penalty, (bymajorityvote)."