A new era in Gaza: Authority is being transferred to a technical committee

A significant turning point is being reached in the Gaza Strip following the long-standing war and humanitarian crisis. Hamas has decided to dissolve its governing structure in the region and hand over administration to a United Nations-backed technical committee. The decision is being viewed as the beginning of a new political process in Gaza following months of ceasefire negotiations.

Hamas officials state that they have taken this step to contribute to the post-war reconstruction of Gaza and the normalization of civilian life. Details regarding Hamas's decision were shared by Ismail al-Thawabteh, Director General of the Government Media Office, in the courtyard of Al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah. Emphasizing that technical and professional staff will remain in their posts, al-Thawabteh stated that those working in service delivery will continue to work under the umbrella of the Gaza Administration National Committee with the status of "civil servants."

Hazem Qassem described the announcement as a "positive step" in line with the ceasefire agreement.

THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING ADMINISTRATION IN GAZA

The US-led Peace Council, which is evaluating Hamas's decision to relinquish power and the new administrative structure to be formed, announced that they would "evaluate the development based on actions." The Peace Council reiterated its emphasis that all weapons in Gaza must come under the control of the technocratic committee.

Ali Shaath, a Gaza-born engineer who chairs the technical committee, stated that they view Hamas's decision positively. However, Shaath pointed out the necessity of a "single, legal authority and a unified security structure" for a healthy administration to be formed. It was noted that the committee's primary task is to restore essential public services in Gaza and conduct civil administration. The entire process will proceed under the supervision of the United Nations and the Peace Council.

On the other hand, the initial reaction from Israel was that this step would not bring about real change as long as Hamas does not lay down its arms. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar argued that as long as Hamas continues to hold its weapons, the newly established civil administration will effectively be directed by Hamas. Israeli officials view Hamas's stance as a political tactic aimed at avoiding pressure for disarmament.

UNCERTAINTY OVER CEASEFIRE AND RECONSTRUCTION PERSISTS

Despite more than nine months having passed since the signing of the ceasefire agreement, progress has yet to be made on many issues between Hamas and Israel, particularly regarding the transfer of administration and disarmament. In the critical second phase of the agreement, negotiations appear to be deadlocked, especially over the clauses requiring Hamas to surrender its weapons and the full transfer of Gaza's administration.

While Hamas argues that the first phase of the ceasefire must be fully implemented before the issue of disarmament can be brought to the agenda, the Israeli side insists that this move should not be delayed to ensure security.

The continuation of Israeli attacks immediately after the ceasefire that went into effect on October 10 is considered another indicator that the crisis of confidence and political friction between the parties persist.

The people of the region continue to wait and see whether this administrative change will be a realistic hope for peace, stability, and reconstruction in Gaza.