Case concluded: British prince left without protection
The UK High Court has ruled that the government's decision to remove Prince Harry's police protection was lawful. King Charles III's son, who lives in the United States, has lost his challenge against the decision to terminate the special protection services provided in the UK.
Taner Bildik
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle, who stepped back from Royal duties in 2020 and moved to the US, were deprived of the special police protection provided to members of the Royal family during their visits to the UK. The Home Office maintained a firm stance on terminating this service, even though the costs would be covered individually.
PROTECTION DECISION AND INTENSE MEDIA INTEREST
The British government and judicial bodies' reluctance to allow wealthy individuals to utilize police forces for private security services was a determining factor in this decision. Prince Harry had frequently voiced his concerns regarding the tragic accident experienced by his mother, Princess Diana, and the excessive interest of the media. Describing the British press as "toxic" and stating that he feared "history repeating itself," the Prince expressed serious concerns about his family's safety during this process.
PRIVATE HEARINGS AND LEGAL BATTLE
The decision was reached as a result of hearings held without the participation of the press and the public due to security reasons. Prince Harry's legal battle for his family's safety has reached a new stage with this outcome.
This decision sets an important precedent regarding policies on the safety of Royal family members and how the media's interest in the Royal family is managed.