Rewinding the film

Achronological breakdown of the events occurring on the Imrali axisreveals that theresulting outcome isnot at all surprising.

Emerging with a Marxist-Leninist foundation Theemergence of Öcalan and the PKK'scurrentevolution toward a separatist-Islamist lineis not new.

The 1990s were a period whenTurkey experienced a shift in axisis the beginning of the period whenthestructure was formed.

Özal'simperialist-guidedneo-liberal policiesaimed not only to eliminate Kemalist economic policies but also the nation and national identity of the Republic,an initiativebecame the beginning of the problems.

Özal’s approach to Turkish identity,though hidden from the public, was clearly stated in the book titled “La Turquie en Europe” (Turkey in Europe), which was written to facilitate entry into the EU and published abroad.in the book titledwas clearlystatedlyhas been put forward.The book, which argues the thesis that "there is nothing in Anatolia that belongs to the Turk and Turkish culture" and describes the formative effects of Greek civilization on the Ottoman system, defines T urkishnessasasub-identity.and was preparing the infrastructure for the Neo-Ottomanist Movement.

The report that was commissioned but could not beimplemented also included the division of Turkey into 13-15-18 provinces.

During the period when he was the RP İstanbul Provincial Chair in the mid-90s,Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also made a similarstatementwith the statement that heimagined Turkeywithin the Ottomanprovincialsystemas hehadthoughtstatement was not coincidental.

In the sameperiod, the PKK and Öcalan turned toward a paradigmshift.The Marxist-Leninist line had been abandoned,and the first steps toward an ummah-based separatist alliancehad begun to be taken.

In 1994 in Berlin a congress was heldunder the name “Kurdistan Islamic Movement”. A statement by Öcalan was read. In his statement,which he began by explaining

that “Kemalism is a Dajjal regime”, Öcalan praised “IslamicInternationalism”with the premise of “True

Islam.”The PKKconductedthestruggle is to present a formthat longedfor, close to the 'Age of Bliss' (Asr-ı Saadet), andto make Kurdistanthe cradle of Islamic Internationalism,” he emphasized. “TheKurdish issue is also the moststated that it was an “Islamic problem”.Thus, the components of the Greater Middle East Project were going on the offensive.

It was understood that growth could not be achieved by creating an effective result along Marxist-Leninist lines,and different beliefand ethnic identity groups

were being mobilized.The strategy shifted towardidentity politics.the path to integration with theEU had been opened.

During the same years, the 2nd Republican cadres under theguidance of imperialism occupied TV channels.Kemalism and the Turkish Nation were targeted. Democracy, human rights, fConcepts with high appeal, such as cultural diversity and freedom, were presented as alternatives to the Atatürk Republic. Society was subjected to mental encirclement.

The destination that these co-opted communities aim to reach is the destruction of the Nation-State and the Unitary Structure, and the dismantling of the Republic's Atatürkist founwas to strip it of its values.

Ummah-ist - Separatist The alliance is being broughtto the point where it is closestto achieving results by the hand of the State.

The same film has been released again, coated in a different sauce, with the lead actorÖcalanin the TTurkey to shape itall resources have been mobilized.

The codes of the projectcarried out by hiding it from society, are the opening of Öcalan and DEMis hidden in his statements.

What did Öcalan say? “ TURKEY WILL CHANGE, THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND TURKEY ENVIRONMENT WILL CHANGE, THE MIDDLE EAST AND THE WHOLE WORLD WWILL CHANGE”.

What have the PKK and the DEM Party said? “A DEMOCRACY-SENSITIVEBASIC RESTRUCTURINGISNECESSARYFOR WORKIS SHINING.”

What did Sırrı Süreyya Önder say? “IT IS THE PERFECT TIME TO IMPLEMENTÖCALAN’S THEORY OF DEMOCRATICCONFEDERALISM.”

This mHasthere been a denial of the statements or a reaction from the State wing? No!

Has society questionedÖcalan's Democratic Confederalism theory and wondered what it is? No!

On the contrary, the following insolent stexplanation has led to complacency.

The explanation is as follows;

“THE STATE SHOULD NOT BE AFRAID, APO AND THE KURDS WILL NOT DESTROY THE STATE, THEY WILL RESTRUCTURE IT. TTURKISH SOCIETY SHOULD NOT FEAR, APO AND KURDS WILL NOT DIVIDE TURKEY, KURDISH FREEDOM WILL NOT BE WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF TTURKEY’S DEMOCRATIZATION FOR WILL WORK”.

In response to these wordsis there any government official who has shouted, “Who are you to talk about tearing down the state,about dividing the country?” Has there been one? No!Against the complacency of

“we will not be divided”created in society,we must remain vigilant. The bar-raising representatives of the Kurdish movement continue to lay their cards on the table.

The unlawful and controversial commission of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, which went to the baby killer to hold a “VERY USEFUL” meeting, continues tonotes conveyed from the meeting, Öcalan'sDemocratic Confederalism model's cluesalsocarries.

Without quoting from this speech First, it is useful to summarize what is aimed forwith DemocraticConfederalism.

• First and foremost, Öcalan, in terms of geographytwo separate states with defined geographical borders does not propose. In other words, the Partition Model has been shelved.

• Öcalan, not a pieceof Turkish territory,but TALL TURKISH PEOPLE ARE DEMANDED.

• THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY A DUAL STRUCTURE, IN STATE GOVERNANCE, EQUAL REPRESENTATION, IN EDUCATION, IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE, IN THE TBMM (GRAND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF TURKEY) KURDSWANTS THEM TO TAKE PART WITH THEIR OWN ETHNIC IDENTITIES.

• KURDISH POPULATION IS IN ALL SETTLEMENTS, FOR THE PUBLIC TO FORM ITS OWN SOCIETY THROUGH ITS OWN “PEOPLE'S COUNCILS” AND TO IMPLEMENT THE SELF-GOVERNANCE MODELITWANTS IT TO BE REVERSED.

He reiterated these demands during the Imrali meeting.

“For everyone (all religious and ethnic identity groups) to have their own community, comto build its university, parliament, and civil society, and in this wayto participate in the system with its own existenceas it wished. It wanted.

Syria exampleThis assessment, based on thealso became valid for Turkeythat “If the state democratizes, if a democratic transformationis achieved, then the people can alsosecure and exist within their own freedomsin that democratic system,” he added.

Furthermore, it was stated that in the event of failure, the "COUP MECHANISM WOULD BE ACTIVATED."

• PKK'snew identity and path forward were alsoannounced.Its new name is "KURDISTANFREEDOM MOVEMENT"is 'I'.

• November 19The statement made by PKK CentralExecutive Helin Ümitonthematter points to the PKK's new position.

"OF THE PKK WE MAY HAVE ENDED ITS ORGANIZATIONAL EXISTENCE.HOWEVER, THE PKKWITH ALL ITSVALUES, REMAINS STANDING AND IS ACTIVELYCONTINUINGITSSTRUGGLE. THE PKK ISA NOVEL, A POEM, A TIS FRIGHTENING”

• KCK co-chair Bese Hozat, on the other hand, said “WE DID NOTCOMMIT A CRIME TO ASK FOR AMNESTY, WE DO NOT WANT A RETURNHOMELAW OR AMNESTY” with herwords, regarding the terrorist organization's weaponsthat the claims that it abandoned and dissolved itself do not reflect thetruth.

The reason why the process was kept hidden from the publicisclear.

During the periods when Turkey stripped the terrorist organization from its lands and the heroic Turkish Armed Forces achieved absolute superiority at the cost of martyrs, in those times, theinitiated "peaceprocesses," how much longer will it continue to sacrifice the successin the fight against terrorism at negotiation tables for the sake of political gain?

By granting theterrorist leaderthe status of "Founding Leader," it continues towound the conscience of society byis it not enough for those who produceto see the reaction givenby the Turkish Nation?

for those who set out to“construct a new identity”for the Turkish Nation and say“The newly established system will be based on Nationalism”ismis the antidote to Will this nation forgive those who walk the path with Öcalan?

SAYINGSTOP TO THE NEW CONSTITUTION ANDUPHOLDINGTURKEY'S FOUNDING DOCTRINE IS OUR MOST FUNDAMENTALDUTY!