Where is politics heading?

The reports of the MHP and the DEM Party werereleased.

Excerpts from the DEM Party's report are being widely shared on social media. As if these demands were being voiced for the first time and everyone is acting so surprised!

Yet, the DEM Party is once again stating what it has been voicing for years, this time directly referencing Öcalanrecorded itin therecords. As an academic who tried to explain what these demands were in the 8 articles I wrote monthsago, and who attempted to announce this picture to the public at conferences, I am nowsurprised by this astonishment.

DEM and Öcalan, unlike before, wanted not just a geographicalregion ofour country,butall of Turkeyfor months I wrotebefore. With a dual structure to be established, the state administrationset out fora "co-presidency"inanoitwas evident.Those who saw this as impossibleand wanted to ignore it,and those who were caught up in the spell of“peace and brotherhood”will they continue to remain silent today,we shall see.we will see.

However, the report'smostsurprising aspect is the MHP's report. For some reason, this reportis not receiving muchattention.

Devlet Bahçeli's 'founding leader' Öcalan and the 'underlying meaning of his words'I wonder what Pervin Buldan, who said "I would sign my name to it," thinks about the MHP's report?

The MHP has prepared a document that is open to all of DEM's demandsand uses a clear and definitive "no vote" language. Regarding the first four articles of the Constitution, the concept of the Turkish Nationto the nation-state, and even to theRepublic of Turkey, stating that everyone who is bound to theTurkish state by the bond of citizenship isa Turk,” and that this expression will remainadhered to. They havedeclared their opposition to education in the mother tongue. Theyemerged. In short, it is saying the same thing itused to say.

However, the MHP, on one single issue, has smeareda drop of honey on the lips of Öcalan and the DEMmembers.

What is that subject? A secret amnesty!

Promises of liberation that arenot called an "amnesty."

• With some changes to be made in the Turkish Penal Code (TCK), the Criminal Procedure Code (CMK), and the Anti-Terror Law,the scope of the"effective remorse"provisions.by expanding theterrorists to be freeto releasefor theproposed pre-conditional and limitedregulatory proposals. Convictedto release those who are currently in the prosecution phase, provided they express remorse, under the condition of 1-3 years of supervised probation, and to reintegrate them into society.

• For thispurpose, by implementing a three-stage regulation; first, ensuring that weaponsare completely laid down, thenensuring that organization members surrender to judicial authorities, and in the final stage, providing rehabilitation services.proposing theinitiation of the process.

What is understood from this project is thatthe MHP also does not believe that the PKK has laid down its arms.

• Anotherproposal is the AThe implementation of ECHR rulings! One cannothelp but wonder... It seemsthat the MHP, during the years when ECHR rulings were not being implemented,was living in outer space during the periodswhen it did not raiseany voice regardingthis process.

• A similar request has also been recorded forConstitutional Courtdecisions.However, this time some reservations have also beennoted.Attentionis drawnto the compliance of individual application rights with certain conditions. by withdrawing, it was requested that the Constitutional Court not place itself as a“super court of appeals.”

•Bahçeli’s demand for the RIGHT TO HOPE had practically left everyonestunned. “Let Öcalan come, the Right to Hopebenefit from it” the statementmade in a high tonehadabombshell effect. However, it turns out we had misunderstood it. I am quoting the expression in the report exactly:

“The right to hope is not the release of the individual from prison, but the reconsideration of execution conditionsprocess. InTurkey, those who have been spared from the death penaltyorhave beensentenced directly to aggravated lifeimprisonmentfor terroroffenderscannot benefit from conditional release.”

Immediately following this statement, the Report refers to the right to hopein the regulationregarding conditional releaseand points to the necessary amendments to be made in the Anti-Terror Law (TMK) andthe Law on the Execution of Sentences.

The course of the bargaining is gradually becomingclear.A "peace and brotherhood" in exchange for a secret amnesty! A phased amnesty for approximately 9,000 PKK/KCK members...Or the readmission of terrorists into Turkish territoryto be harbored as a potential threat...

As we will recall, in the previous "Solution Process," alaw that was enacted There was the“Homecoming Law.” What happened to it?

Once the toothpasteis out of thetube, how manyattempts to put it back had we given martyrs?

“Turkey will be restructured” said the so-called “founding leader” to the commission members in İmralı “while the people, without the most communal structures of the assembliesbeing organized,are talking about and positioning themselves as the legitimate leader of a new political movement”How did they receive the MHP's report? Why did the AKP not prepare a report?

Where is the CHP's report?

T

TWhere is Turkish politics heading?

Undoubtedly, there are many answers to this. But we will have to waita little longer...