A country that has lost its 'reason'!..

Not a day goes by that we do not witnessevents beyond reason in the judiciary, politics, economy, education, health, and foreign policy, and more importantly, the "rationalization," or rather the normalization, of theseevents.

Here are a fewexamples of this picture:

Justthis pastIn those days, Mesut Barzani came to Cizre andshowed off with his long-barreled weaponsand his maroon-beret peshmerga.

When MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli criticized this scene,Barzani's office not only claimed that thismanner of arrival was carried out with the approvalof the relevant Turkish institutions, but also...Bahçeli, saying, "We believe that Godhas granted guidance to Devlet Bahçeli, and that he has abandonedracialism and chauvinism,haswe thought it was. However, itappears that he is still the old Bozkurt, only now he has donneda sheep'sclothing,” he criticized.

Erdoğan and AKPspokesperson Ömer Çelik, regarding thesestatementswhile demanding it be corrected, our Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded both an explanation from the KDP leadership and that the necessary actions be taken against those responsible immediately.

The result?

Not Barzani's office or the KDP leadership, but the "Kurdistan government" made a statement. In the statement, after emphasizing that the interest shown to Barzani in Cizre was “admirable,” it was stated that “following this historic visit, unfortunately, different, unwanted, and excessive comments and evaluations have come to the agenda, and this situation has caused concerns and led tohas beenachieved. The important point is that thisexceptional period captured in the relations between the Republic of Turkey and the Kurdistan Regionwas mentioned.” Following this,attention was drawn to the importance of the “peaceprocess,” and “solidaritydialogue, strengthening relations, common interests andregional stabilityfocusing on protecting” acall was made. In short, “peaa warning was issued that 'the process might be harmed'.There is no apology from Bahçeli, nor is there any action taken against those responsible...

But even Ahmet Hakan,said, 'This does not fully compensate for the disrespect shown.'...

... ...explanation. It only makes one say 'well, I guess.' Just as we reached that point, our lion-hearted media, including the MHP's official publication, considered this flimsy exexplanation a 'step back', can you believe it?

Fortunately, Bahçeli said yesterday, 'The Cizre provocation and someother exstatements will not intimidate us... I am, of course, a gray wolf, and that is how I will passon,” he said, implying that Barzanidid not takea single stepbackwards.

Whether they came in person or connected via Zoom... Under what law?

In a state that is reasonable and, above all, a state of law, laws are not violated for terrorists, right?But what happened?

First, the aggravated life

imprisonment sentencewashwho is a convict the terrorist leader inImraliisin violation of the laws in forceby connecting via Zoom to the organization in Qandil and possibly the terrorist leaders in Syriawithwasconducted. That wasn't enough; grown men wanted the terrorist leaderto connectand speak to the PKK commission in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey using the samemethod. That didn't happen, three members of parliament wentto his fwas proposed. But there are still those who want the 51 commission members to listen to the terrorist leadervia SEGBİS.

We witnessed a similarillegality with our own eyes today.

Itis as follows; DEM, in Istanbul held an "International peace and democratic society conference" organized.Beforehand,

permission was requested from the governmentso that İlham Ahmed, the so-calledforeign relations head ofterrorist leader Mazlum Kobani in Syria,could personally attend this meeting.

AKP Spokesperson Ömer Çelik responded to this request four days ago gave the following response:

“These are matters to be addressedwithin the framework of abandoning terroristactivities. Let them abandonthem, and they are welcome to come. The person youmentioned is someone who talks about not laying down arms; who explains whyit is necessaryby saying ‘we cannot lay down arms,’ someone who explains it within the framework of 'our international obligations'. The title he uses also expresses an approach that is contrary to Syria's territorial integrity. It is an approach that is contrary to it.”

Theend?

Although the DEM Partyhad previously publishedthe conference program and announced that İlham Ahmed, who uses the title "Co-Chair of the Department of Foreign Relations of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria", would jointhis conference via Zoom, neither the meeting nor Ahmed's connection via Zoom was obstructed.

So, In the words of Ömer Çelik, İlham Ahmed, who "speaks of not laying downarms," is acting in a way that is contrary to theintegrityofSyria.what did he say at the conference under the title of 'expressing a harsh approach'?

explaining that the so-called autonomous administration in Syria plays an important roleunder theinfluence of theterrorist leader, and from Turkeydemandingan end to the war-clash” wanted those who say it to lower their voices!..

Inreality, whose voiceshould be lowered, would you look at thisutterance of theirs?!

Terterroristleader's crime(!); whatever it may be; instead of providing him with the opportunity for Zoom,the message was read by Veysi Aktaş, who was released from Imralı in July.

Theterroristleader, on the other hand, spoke again of "the failure of nation-state socialism, the perspective of a democratic republic and nation, and collective rights"!

Explain; Let Us Decide Together

This is our last'reason'...

The main architect of the newopening, Devlet Bahçeli, has twice called on the head of theterrorists, “that laying down arms also includes the SDG/YPG/PYD call for them to do so” even though he wanted, the head of the terrorist organizationignored hisword and let itfallcontinued.

Despite all the reactions from thenation, while it was decided to sendthree members of parliament to theleader of the terrorists; it was emphasized that thefocus of the meeting would be to ask whether they would make the SDG/YPG/PYD in Syria lay down their arms.

The endit?

Yes, it was asked, but we could notlearn the answer ofthe terrorist leader.

Because the Speaker of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) and the PKK commissionchairman Numan Kurtulmuş beforehand, said “The members of parliament who go to İmralı will explain their ownobservations and notesto the commission. What isimportant is that the main outlines of what was discussedthere are shared with the commission. Nothing has been donesecretly from the public so far, and thismeetingeven though it was stated that 'the meeting will not remain secret,' a three-to-four-page summary report, prepared by an unknown party and objected to even by the DEM members, hastilywritten three-to-four-pagebrief summary report was read.

DEM member Gülistan Kly Koçyiğit also, in an interview with Cansu Çamlıbel, laid everything out on the table—that is, he did not talk about leaving weapons in Syria, but rather brought up the Barzanistan model.

But for example, the Ankara Representative of the pro-government newspaper Sabah, Okan Müderrisoğlu, did not focus on this, but rather on Gülistan Kılıç Koçyiğit's statement, "I believe the government, regardless of whether it stays in power or not, this sconducted the processInever thoughtaboutit. And I still don'tthinkabout it, franklyspeakingregretting their words, "It is a clear injustice, a great disrespect to Erdoğan and Bahçeli, and complained about“great injustice being done.”

The final bombshell was dropped by MHP Leader Bahçeliand “weare on the verge of being the subject of dazzlingdevelopments.” theannouncement of the terrorist leaderregarding the statements he made tothreemembersof parliamentfor said thefollowing:

“Thefounding leadershipof the PKK’s messages are reasonable, positive, credible, and definite.”

Continuingas well, “Making intentional public statements contrary to this message,distortingthe process, and muddying the clear water hasno meaningor significance whatsoever.”he added. he added.

The terrorist leader's statements are "reasonable, appropriate, credible and specific"; the DEM Party's Koçyiğit's explanations are "intentional and distorted", is that so?

Who madethis decision and communicated it to the nation; they themselves!..

If you are that sure, go ahead; open all the minutesclick, and let the nation be the referee...

After all, isn't it the Turkish Nation whose fate is being decided?

Just like the one suspended at jet speed in Eskişehir, who was sAs our on-duty traffic police officersaid; isn't thisTurkey,and shouldn't the final wordalways be spoken by the Turkish Nation here?!

Müyesser YILDIZ

December7, 2025