In the words of IYI Party Chairman Müsavat Dervişoğlu, TBMM Speaker Numan Kurtulmuş, who established the PKK commission in a pirated manner—that is, without receiving approval from the Parliamentary General Assembly—called for the establishment of a very serious research commission in Parliament “without ifs or buts, and without any hesitation” following the school massacres in Kahramanmaraş and Şanlıurfa.
Following this proposal by Kurtulmuş, a third commission was established, even though two commissions regarding children had already been formed in the last legislative term.
While the ordinary process was followed in establishing the commission regarding the school attacks that hurt us all, why was the commission on the issue of separatist terrorism, which has been hurting us for 40 years, established with an extraordinary process and in such a rush? Because, supposedly, the PKK had disbanded itself and laid down its arms!..
Now, a transition to a “legal process” for the terrorists is being discussed.
It was reported that at the AKP MKYK meeting on April 9, Erdoğan stated that the stage reached in the process was extremely valuable, saying, “This is a historic opportunity. It is time to say ‘Bismillah’ (In the name of God) to the legal process.”
On the same day, TBMM Speaker Kurtulmuş spoke as follows:
“It must be demonstrated that the organization has completely disbanded itself. The organization’s weapons must be surrendered in their entirety, and in parallel with this, as we stated in our report, the necessary legal regulations must be made... While politics has taken on such a great responsibility and has successfully carried it out, our most fundamental expectation is for the organization to fulfill its own responsibilities and for the process of laying down arms, which was agreed upon at the outset, to be accelerated.”
So, it turns out the PKK has not disbanded itself and has not laid down its arms!..
When Vice President Cevdet Yılmaz joined the discussions with the words, “DEM needs to be clear about the process and abandon its style of assigning tasks to public institutions and the state,” DEM co-chair Tülay Hatimoğulları responded, “The authority to legislate lies with the government. You are the ones dragging it out. Don’t be offended when we remind you of this. Democracy cannot be conditional, nor can it be a subject of bargaining.”
The AKP had an MYK meeting on April 13. Spokesperson Ömer Çelik, while criticizing those in DEM who targeted Erdoğan and Bahçeli, said, “When you reject the state mechanism that will verify that the organization has laid down its arms, there is no possibility for this process to function. Coding the verification mechanism as a burden or as a mechanism that will block the process means this: it means expressing that the organization is against this process of laying down arms.”
How was this unknown path embarked upon? Security units, primarily the MİT, were supposed to report that the PKK had completely laid down its arms, and only then would the transition to legal regulations take place. It seems that DEM/PKK does not accept this equation either.
Çelik said one more thing; MİT Undersecretary İbrahim Kalın gave a presentation to the AKP MYK. Why only the AKP? Why is there nothing for the process partner MHP, the shy supporter CHP, or other parties?!
Let us continue.
A few days after these discussions, the “queen of Imralı” Pervin Buldan reported that the “state delegation” meeting with the terrorist leader had “expectations for the PKK to take more concrete steps” and had said, “‘We have not seen a concrete step after the weapon-burning ceremony.’”
Immediately afterward, one of the terrorist leaders in Qandil, Duran Kalkan, threatened, “A tactical approach will bring disaster to Turkey... For us, there is no turning back from change and transformation. We will change and we will subject Turkey to democratic change,” while claiming that the “TC (Republic of Turkey) state” was the first founding model of “nation-state statism,” but that Iraq, Libya, and Iran, which applied the same version, had collapsed, adding, “Turkey is next.”
The Model is Being Produced in the “Syrian Laboratory”
In our article titled “Imagine the Terrorist Leader is the Minister of Defense” on January 22, we asked, “Which one will be the model; Syria or Turkey?”, recalled the “Alevi and Kurdish Vice Presidency” project proposed for Turkey by MHP leader Bahçeli, and noted the following:
“Let us first adapt this to Syria: Would you like it if Mazlum Kobani or another SDF member—whom Bahçeli both calls a ‘terrorist’ and suggests should be integrated into the Syrian administration, and who has signed his name to many actions in Turkey—were first made Minister of Defense or Chief of General Staff, and then, after the transition to the presidential system, brought in as vice president as the ‘representative of the Kurds’?!”
Tom Barrack, the colonial governor of Trump, who manages to irritate the Turkish nation with every statement he makes while the government cannot utter a single word, emphasized at the recently held Antalya Diplomacy Forum that Syria is an important “laboratory” to test whether dialogue and cooperation work, and then said that the process has been progressing positively so far.
He must have been referring to the “dialogue and cooperation” between the HTS leader Colani/Shara, whom they brought to the head of Syria, and the head of the PKK, Mazlum Kobani.
Indeed, the two names recently came together in Damascus. It was reported that the center of the negotiations was “the announcement that the SDF has been officially disbanded and the appointment of Kurdish representatives to high-level government positions in the Syrian state.”
Nureddin Isa Ahmed, who was appointed Governor of Hasakah on the PKK quota, stated that “the integration process between the autonomous administration and the government in Damascus is continuing successfully,” while defining the process not as “‘the end of the autonomous administration’ but as ‘taking it to a higher level’ by including it in state institutions.”
Finally, while it was announced that the so-called autonomous administration had prepared a list of representatives to take part in Syrian ministries, Hasan Muhammad Ali, the head of the general relations office of the so-called assembly, made the following summary statements regarding the negotiations being conducted:
“Within the framework of the agreement reached with Damascus, Kurds will not just be a part of the state in the new era, but an essential partner... When integration occurs, all institutions of the autonomous administration will gain official status and will continue to exist as a local autonomous administration... With this process, the SDF is also becoming an official force and a de facto partner. A first is being experienced in Syrian history... Kurds will take part in all ministries, state institutions, and the bureaucracy. They will be integrated into the state’s security system with their own autonomous security forces. Even if it is not named, a decentralization will be implemented in essence. From now on, Kurds will not only have a say for northeastern Syria, but will also be a de facto partner with a say in the decisions taken in Damascus.”
Anything else?
Explaining that Mazlum Kobani insists on Kurdish being the language of instruction from primary school to university and that this issue will be finalized through negotiations to be held with the Ministry of Education, Hasan Muhammad Ali confirmed that Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al-Shaibani had requested a list of Kurdish names who would serve in state ranks from Kobani and Ilham Ahmed—both of whom Turkey is still searching for with red notices—while claiming that Colani/Shara had offered Kobani the vice presidency by saying, “When will you come here? Let us work together as the leadership.”
It Will Be the “Democratic Wing of the State”
Let us return to Bahçeli’s “founding leader.”
When the allegation that a house/office was being built for him in Imralı came to the agenda, Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek had given an answer in the form of “Ye-es.”
According to what Ruşen Çakır from Medyascope reported, the terrorist leader said in the meetings in February, “They have built a building, the status of the building is important. It is neither a prison nor a house... It is neither fish nor fowl... In this situation, I will not go to this building. It cannot be done without considering the political and legal dimensions. A state does not do business this way. The legal dimension is important. Spiritually, I cannot live with this status.”
Again in these meetings, while explaining that he was trying to protect Turkey from Zionist Israel, look at what the terrorist leader said and what he wanted:
“I have endured this style for 40 years... They used the definition of ‘baby killer.’ I cannot be called a baby killer... I must be at the head of the executive... My freedom is necessary for execution. I can stay here too. But the law must cover all my friends. There could also be a limited political ban for some friends. For example, five years. We will not come to Parliament, but we will protect our other political rights. We will engage in politics continuously. A democratic politics condition that covers all of these is necessary. If Parliament takes a decision regarding this, the process will not be prolonged... We are the most authoritarian, most rule-abiding, most law-knowledgeable democratic republic group. As the creator of this process and the guide for such a mass, I will also become the democratic wing of the state... Over time, it is necessary to reach a state reality that recognizes Kurds constitutionally. Kurds are not within the scope of the law. We want to include them in the scope of the Constitution in Syria and Turkey... Where there is law, there is no weapon. As democratic politics, what we are talking about will become law once it is legislated.”
In short; if, within the scope of the model produced by the US-Israel in the Syrian laboratory, his “spiritual son” Mazlum Kobani is to be made Vice President, what wouldn’t the terrorist leader in Imralı want?!
Müyesser YILDIZ
April 23, 2026
Most Read
Striking picture for Özgür Özel's 'New Party'
The PKK opening and Özgür Özel’s path!..
How did the newspapers view Özgür Özel's farewell to the CHP?
He killed his wife by slitting her throat: Their children witnessed the moments
What did the CHP do?
Özel’s new party move in the world press
Kılıçdaroğlu's first message on Özgür Özel's new party announcement
The New CHP, against CEHAPE
From self-efficacy to despair
Zeydan Karalar's decision on the New Party