'With cries of peace, Turkey is practically being led to hell'!..

The AKP-MHP and their media are celebrating like it's a wedding after the separatist terrorist organization PKK announced it was dissolving itself.

Turks have been called "genocidal," the abolition of the Treaty of Lausanne and the 1924 Constitution has been demanded, the 1921 Constitution—which includes "autonomy"—has been pointed to, and a massive "democratization package" has been placed before the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM); what does it matter!..

In particular, MHP Leader Devlet Bahçeli, who initiated this new opening, is overjoyed. So much so that he thanked "Abdullah Öcalan, the founding leader of the PKK, who has taken historical responsibility with his call for peace and a democratic society."

According to Bahçeli; without the MHP and the People's Alliance taking a single step back, "the seeds of peace have been watered with hope, have budded, and blossomed," "the torch of a Turkey without terror has been lit," and "the winners are peace, brotherhood, politics, democracy... and even the friendly and brotherly peoples in the neighboring geographies."

Fortunately; even if he didn't mention the PKK's Lausanne delusion, he touched a little on the "genocide" slander!..

 According to the pro-government media; this decision "has revealed that the PKK has been defeated," "it hasn't dissolved, it has surrendered"...

The answer given by AKP MP Hulusi Akar, the former head of the TSK (Turkish Armed Forces) which has thousands of martyrs, to the question "How did this happen?" is also very meaningful; he explained: "There is no 'how it happened' or anything; the state put its will forward and said, 'Come out and speak.' What will you say? 'Dissolve the organization, lay down your arms.' He came out and spoke; 'Dissolve the organization, lay down your arms.' The organization has been dissolved, the weapons are being laid down."

Since there is no step back, no bargaining, and no concessions; no one is asking, "With what audacity does a terrorist organization challenge the state and the nation like this and say, 'From now on, your interlocutor is Öcalan'?"!..

Who Changed or Transformed?

Let us recall the most used slogans in this process initiated by Bahçeli.

"We are standing tall to end terror and rewrite history with regional stability. We are determined to rewrite history without making concessions to imperial powers. There is no loser in peace, and no winner in war. Therefore, we are ready and here for everyone to win with peace." it was said...

"Turkish-Kurdish brotherhood" was emphasized...

Ultimately; the terrorist leader was elevated to the status of "leader" of our citizens of Kurdish origin... Politics and the TBMM were shown as the address for the solution to the so-called "Kurdish question"...

Let us start with this "peace" rhetoric.

Guess who said the following during the opening-scattering process in 2013:

"The heirs of those who signed the Treaty of Sèvres by calling it a peace treaty are today preparing the funeral ceremony of the Turkish nation once again with words of peace... If peace is being mentioned, has a war been entered into, and is this what is intended to be ended? If there was a war, who or whom does the opposing front consist of? Has the PKK become the equal and interlocutor of the Turkish state?.. The freakish phrase 'There is no winner in peace, no loser in war' has been served up almost to equate and show the Republic of Turkey as the same as the PKK."

Of course, it was Bahçeli!..

And what about the "Turkish-Kurdish brotherhood" issue? Let us listen to Bahçeli again. Once upon a time, he was asking, "Until the AKP came, when was there a Turkish-Kurdish distinction, when was it made? Until the AKP came, whose idea was it to divide the Turkish nation into 36?"

Well, is it possible for the terrorist leader to be the representative of our citizens of Kurdish origin and the spokesperson for the PKK? Here are the answers of the old Bahçeli:

"The terrorist leader lying in Imralı is not the representative of my brothers of Kurdish origin. The PKK is not the spokesperson for my brothers of Kurdish origin."

"The Imralı murderer is not the leader of my citizens of Kurdish origin, and he will not be."

"The PKK is a savage terrorist organization and is never, ever the representative, defender, protector, or patron of my brothers of Kurdish origin; it has not been, and will not be."

"The PKK is a disgusting hitman of imperialism. The PKK is a rotten subcontractor of the enemies of the Kurds, of the seven nations that cannot stomach Turkey."

"If the US President sees the PKK/PYD/YPG as Kurds, if he evaluates them as the representative of our Kurdish brothers, he is either the hub of ignorance or the guide of savagery. Let alone calling terrorists Kurds, even calling them human is treason."

Finally, let us come to making politics and the TBMM the address for the solution of the "Kurdish question." Bahçeli was saying just 3.5 years ago:

"Showing politics and the TBMM as the address for the solution of the so-called Kurdish question is an appetite and desire to stain the national will with traitorous separatists... Seeing baby killers as legitimate, and aiming to establish the conditions for meeting, talking, and agreeing with them is cruelty, humiliation, and hostility toward Turkey... Trying to spread the demands of separatist terror to all our citizens of Kurdish origin will mean that the PKK is the spokesperson and representative of all of them."

Is it a "Domestic and National Solution"?

With the opening initiated by Bahçeli, it was explained that this was the result of "state wisdom" and that it was "domestic and national."

Now, propaganda is being made that, "There is no third eye, no third mind from the outside; there wasn't, and there won't be," "We achieved this on our own. And against the US, the British, Israel, and Iran"...

It is being discussed that PKK ringleaders will be sent to countries like Sweden and Norway...

Well, if it is despite them, why are the US, the EU, and Germany so happy?!

Shall we listen to Kurdish politician Muhammed Emin Pencweni, whom the terrorist leader in Imralı sent word to during the previous opening-scattering process saying, "I was going to make you my Iraq representative," and who explained what would happen in this opening back in January?

While stating that Nechirvan Barzani played an important role at the center of the process after the PKK's so-called dissolution decision, he claimed that this decision was "shaped with the support of international actors, especially the US, the UK, and France," and also alleged that the so-called congress took place under the security protection of the US, and noted the following:

"If the process proceeds healthily and Turkey fulfills the promises it made in Imralı with the guarantee of actors like the US, the PKK's struggle will now continue on the political plane within Turkey."

The bitter truth is that;

What is placed before us today, as Bahçeli also pointed out in the past, is the "Democratic republic and peace project" proposed by the baby killer at the PKK's 7th Congress in February 2000...

It is what is written in the book "Turkey's Kurdish Question" by CIA agents Graham Fuller, Henri Barkey, and Morton Abramowitz...

It is the voluminous roadmap titled "Disarming, Demobilizing and Reintegrating The Kurdistan Worker’s Party" by David L. Phillips, director of the US Council on Foreign Relations, dated 2007...

It is the recommendations in the report titled "Preventing Conflict over Kurdistan" that Henry Barkey presented to the Obama administration in 2009...

It is what the CIA and Soros-linked Freedom House, the British Royal Institute Chatham House, and the International Crisis Group have been putting before us for years...

In almost all of these, it has been emphasized that "Lausanne prevents the unification of the Kurds," and likewise, the draft constitution prepared for Barzanistan with the contributions of the UN also makes reference to "Wilsonian principles, Sèvres, and the UN Twin Covenants"...

Bahçeli, Lausanne, and the 1921 Constitution

After all this, let us also recall the past views of Bahçeli, who remains silent about the PKK targeting Lausanne and pointing to the 1921 Constitution.

On the 98th anniversary of Lausanne in 2021, he summarized the following:

"The Treaty of Lausanne is a document of honor that still maintains its meaning and content from the first day. It was possible in Lausanne for the will of independence and future to become a flag in the global arena at a time when the vultures of Sèvres were flapping their wings... Throwing the Treaty of Lausanne into the corridors of polarization with political prejudices, ideological dogmas, and intellectual obsessions is ruthlessness and historical ignorance... The Treaty of Lausanne is the political and diplomatic success of a magnificent dawn, of the crescent that did not fall before the cross. Overshadowing this success is humiliation and defeat itself... The legal and political sovereignty of the Republic of Turkey, as well as its eternal existence, were founded in Lausanne, and this matter is closed, never to be opened again."

On the 100th anniversary in 2023, he emphasized the following:

"It is observed with regret these days that separatist and surrenderist circles who are fans of Sèvres are beginning to stir as if they have received commands from a single center, and are beginning to question and dilute the Treaty of Lausanne. The stained puppets of imperialism are back in action to revive Sèvres, which is the funeral ceremony of the Eastern Question. It is no coincidence that the separatist terrorist organization PKK has started black propaganda against the Treaty of Lausanne since the beginning of this year... The real goal of those who have joined the queue of lies and sedition according to a plan to settle scores with the Treaty of Lausanne is to serve the harassment and destruction of Turkey... It should be known that those who poke at the Treaty of Lausanne from here and there, and interpret it disconnected from national truths and historical documents, are the remnants of colonialism who are determined to torch the Republic of Turkey. The impositions of this mindless and anti-national mob will not be allowed, and the principles and foundations of the Treaty of Lausanne, whose borders were drawn with the National Struggle, will not be compromised."

We have previously written in detail about who desires the 1921 Constitution. Let us also add what Bahçeli said in 2010. He reacted to the Imralı negotiations at that time as follows:

"We see that the bloody roadmap determined by the Imralı murderer in 2009, the death route, has been and is being implemented one by one by the AKP. Whatever the terrorist leader said yesterday, the Prime Minister has repeated today and adopted it as if it were something new. The Imralı murderer emphasized the 1921 Constitution, praised this constitution, and the Prime Minister expressed the same. The Imralı murderer mentioned that problems started to be experienced after 1924, and the Prime Minister used the same language... The Imralı murderer and Prime Minister Erdoğan have found each other like a pot and its lid, and have overlapped on their goals."

And he concluded those words with this warning:

"Under the joint efforts of this duo, with cries of solution and peace, Turkey is practically being led to hell."

Now let us ask:

Since there is no change in the target of the PKK and its bosses; who or what has changed?!

Müyesser YILDIZ

May 14, 2025