AKP Spokesperson Çelik evaluates Ensarioğlu's 'Hakan Fidan should resign' remarks: Galip Bey has made a new statement

Çelik pointed out that the National Solidarity,Fraternity and Democracy Commission has completeda very important stage in the workithas been conductingwithin the framework of a 'Terror-free Turkey', and that at this point,the political parties have submitted their reports. noting that, "The People's Alliance members, both us and the Nationalist Movement Party, have providedreports where the principles put forward are common and similar. Regarding approaches and evaluations, there is ahigh degree of harmony. This is, for the People's Alliance,amatter of, git expresses a will pursued to bring Turkey to days without terrorism for the resolution of such a major issue and, inconnection with this, tobring our region to an environment free of terrorism.The roadmap has functioned as intended so far," he said.

In the report presented as the AKP,theviews are very clearstating that it was expressed clearly Çelik said, "Our friends have alsoclearly demonstrated thisin the speeches madeon the occasion of thisbudget." In the coming period there are caves that have been evacuated so far, symbolic dweapons left on the surface. In the coming period, the steps to be taken regarding the laying down of weapons and the burning of weapons; the process of the dissolution of the terrorist organization can be seen in practice,some reports and observations where it can be detected and confirmedemerge.will ensure it emerges. This situation willmake many issues extremelyeasier," he said.

"The unwavering will set by our President ensured that the attempts on December 17-25 and on the night of July 15 were thwarted."

FETÖ terrorist organizationby Turkey's national sovereigntto theattemptedDecember 17-25 judicial coup attemptanniversaryof thealso touching upon theanniversary, Çelik said, "PresidentThe unwavering will that our Presidentdemonstrated that day,and the strong stance he exhibitedwithout any hesitation,ensured that theseattempts were thwartedboth on December 17-25 and on the night of July 15. Therefore, here, perhaps in the history ofthe Turkish state,one of the greatest dangers to our political life and social life has beenaverted in this way," he stated.

"The Israeli Chief of General Staff saying 'The Yellow Line is the new border' is actually a statementthatis the exact opposite of a ceasefire."

aimed at violating theceasefire agreement reached Emphasizing that Israelproduces new acts andaggression every day,Çelik stated, "As of now,58 percent of Gazais de facto ocis under occupation. Naturally, certain lines have been established here. One of these is the 'Yellow Line'. In fact, the 'Yellow Line' was put forward as one of the military measures necessary to reach a ceasefire.However, the Israeli Chief of General Staff saying that the 'Yellow Line is the new border' is actually a statement that is the exact opposite of a ceasefire.This is a statement that does not serve a ceasefire; on the contrary, it positions the Yellow Line as an annexation.This situation is a complete breakdown of all mechanisms of the ceasefire.This is a statement that does not serve a ceasefire; on the contrary, it positions the Yellow Line as an annexation.This is a statement that does not serve a ceasefire; on the contrary, it positions the Yellow Line as an annexation.This situation is a complete breakdown of all mechanisms of the ceasefire.This situation is a complete breakdown of all mechanisms of the ceasefire.and to reach a ceasefireforthe roadmap that needs to be implementedcontrary to all its dynamics. Therefore, here, starting with the 'Yellow Line' all these linesare actuallya temporary military measureand that it was created to reach a ceasefire,' he said.

AKP Spokesperson Çelik, after hisstatement, answered questions from members of the press.

'Galip Bey hasmade astatement today, asthe states that he did not intend to refer to any of our ministers in his statement"

When asked by a journalist about the remarksallegedly targetingForeign Minister Hakan Fidan made by AKP Diyarbakır Deputy Mehmet Galip Ensarioğlu, Çelik said,"Our President, as the head of our state, has outlinedthe foreign policy line; is being followed exactly both by all our colleaguesin the cabinet and by our party under the leadership of our chairman. Regarding the SDF, there is no difference of opinion orviewamong our ministers orviewdiscrepancy. Likewise, none of our colleaguesin the cabinethave any activity or statement outside the will of our President.is not the case. We have beenstatingour viewfrom the beginning.In this context, ourMinister of Foreign Affairs'and what he says isa result of our President's will. Our Minister ofNational Defenseand our NationalIntelligence Organization areconductingtheiractivities are also within this will and this framework. The statements we make herearealsowithin the scope of this will. All of these arematured by the institutions that conduct politicsand presented to our President; variousgroupssecurity andevaluation meetings are presented on the occasion. Issues are addressed down to their most strategic details, a framework isbeing established, and ultimately, the instructions given by our President as the head of our state are being workedon. Therefore, it is not correct to look for a contradictionbetween our ministers or between the party and the cabinet. From time to time, some commentsWe see that people say, 'this person is speaking harshly, that person is speaking softly.' There is nosuch situation.Our stance is clear. Therefore, there is no distinction ordifference in this matter between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of NationalDefense, and the NationalIntelligence Organization Presidency.there is no question oflooking ahead. Within the framework of themechanism I mentioned a moment ago, the willput forward by our President, who is the head of our state, and the instructions he has given are being carried out. Galip Bey has made a statement today,implying somethingelse by this, hehe saidthat he did not mean any of our ministers here," he replied.

"There cannot be two armies in a country, there cannot be two armedforceseither."

Minister of National DefenseYaşar GWhen asked about Güller's statements regarding the integration of the SDF,Çelik replied that, "From the SDF side,demands are made from time to timealong the lines of; 'let us be part of the system as a bloc, as a special force.'However, we have stated this before; what this means is somethingelse entirely. we see in countries. There cannot be two armies in one country, two armed forces. There cannot be two armed forces at the army level.If it is desired, the end of this is a civil warscenario. Insuch a scenario, Arabs lose, Turkmens lose, Kurds lose; Alawites, Sunnis, Nusayris, Yazidis, Shiites, everyone loses. What we desire is for the Turk, the Kurd, and the Arabto win together; a brotherly, honorable, prosperous, and peaceful future to be bis to be built in our region.Therefore, saying 'I accept the March 10 agreement, but I will implement it in blocks'actually meansthat you will operate as a new army withinthe army, and we all know what that means.The reason these words were spoken is, unfortunately, amisunderstanding,he said.

"Turkey's military and other preparations to ensure its national security are always in place."

Regarding whether an operation would be on the agenda if the March 10 Agreement is not complied with,when asked about this, he replied:

"Turkey's national securityreadiness in military andother areas to ensureis always present; there is no problem with this. TThe Turkish ArmedForces do not need to waittwo or three days, two or three weeks, or even two or three months. At this moment, as soon as our President, as 'commander-in-chief,' gives the order, the armed forces have the preparations to carry it out. We do not want there to be a needfor these.We want there to be no need for these.When there is a needfor them, this hesitais fulfilled without hesitation" he stated..

"It has been stated that the DEM Party will request an appointment from our President, butthere is no schedule regarding that yet."

Regarding the questionof whether a meeting requesthad beenreceived from the DEM Party for President Erdoğan, following the DEM Party's meeting with the AKP group over the weekendUpon being reminded of themeeting heheld,Çelik stated, "They expressed that they would request an appointment from our President,but there is no schedule regarding that yet. When we come together in suchmeetings, wediscuss the realities."Everyone is truly expressing theirviews in the most comprehensiveway. This time, in the samemanner, they and weexpressed our views politely.Commonthoughtpoints we agree on, common points where we do not agree.In line with the principles we set forth in the report we submitted to the commission, if common ground can be found, this could facilitate progress in thecoming period.wethink," he said. "We condemn

this act carried out against our friend İshak in the strongest we condemn it in this manner"

Following a question regarding the scuffle that broke out among members of parliamentduring the 2026 budgetdeliberations in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) as they concludedand moved to the votingprocess, Çelik stated, "Tensions can rise in politics from time to time. I wishthis tension nevernever physical violenceshouldnot occur, but yesterday unfortunatelya very clear act of violence was carried outagainst our friendİshakwith address. An answer is given with words. A person can express a situation they do not like with words. However, to our friend İshakWe condemn this actcarried out againstin the strongest possible terms. We were with him last night. While Mr. İshak was there to calm the situation and separate the parties, he was attacked by a person whose name I do not wish to mention. Afterwards, the CHP Group Deputy Chairs arrived and expressed their regrets. We find this important. However, what is essential is that this attack on Mr. İshak isin no way an acceptable act of barbarism and vandalism. This isfor anopen apology is extremely important. Furthermore,the initiation of a disciplinaryprocessby the CHP regarding the person who carried outthis barbarism and vandalismis also essential for the reputation and dignity of Parliament.will be extremely valuable in terms of" he stated.in every debate, turning to the AKP benches and engaging in the politics of exploitation by saying 'you are enemies of Atatürk' does not solve the issue"

Noting that many debates can occur in the political arenaand that there is no issue that cannot be answered with political reason,Çelik emphasized that these matters should be addressed

within the framework ofdemocratic norms. Çelik continued his remarks as follows:

"The debate is frequently brought to this point: Those speaking on behalf of the Republican People's Party say, 'We are the party of Atatürk, we are the party that founded the Republic.' Being a continuation of a party that Atatürk chaired, which also has dimensions that need to be debated separately, is something that today'sadministrators or those engaged in political activitiesmust address.cannot be a justificationto cover up alltheir mistakes. We are talking about a mistake made today, a wrong policy, a wrong behavior.However, the subject is immediately pulled in this direction.Our group chairman also asked yesterday; 'if you say you arethe party of Atatürk,then'and if you are accusingus,why did your second chairman remove the name and picture of Atatürk from the currency when he became President?’ This is aclearquestion.It means that in every field, a pureone saying 'we are the party of Atatürk' does not absolve all of the CHP's actions. I would like to ask a question here as well;Atatürk, in his will, requested that the dividends obtained from his shares in İş Bankasıbe given to the Turkish Language Association and the Turkish Historical Society. However, the CHP has repeatedly failed to fulfill this,and has not complied with Atatürk's will.These institutions, in accordance with Atatürk'swill, were required to receive the dividendsthat were due to them; however, because the CHPdid not comply with Atatürk's will,they were forced to obtain themthrough a court order.From his mobile phone, he searched for 'CHP İş Bank shares dividendsAtatürk's' can search in the form of; on this subject a very long judicial process emerges. For this reason, in every debate, saying 'We are Atatürk's party' or turning to the AKP ranks and saying 'You are Atatürk enengaging in a politics of exploitation by saying 'you are an enemy of' does not solve the issue. This isnot a common-sense approach either."

News Source: 12punto