Bombshell claim from Fatih Altaylı: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı named 3 people in his testimony
Fatih Altaylı has shared a new claim regarding the testimony of Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı, who was released from custody in the illegal betting investigation.
Journalist Fatih Altaylı has brought a striking claim to the agenda regarding Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı, who was released approximately three and a half months after being arrested as part of an illegal betting investigation.

Recalling that he had previously received information that Kütahyalı had become a "confessor" and had written that he would be released, Altaylı stated that this time he was contacted by a source known to have access to information from government and judicial circles.

According to Altaylı's article, the source in question said they had obtained the testimony Kütahyalı gave as part of the investigation. It was stated that the source argued the testimony, in their own assessment, qualified as a "confessor's statement."
"A FULL CONFESSOR'S STATEMENT"
The person speaking to Altaylı said, "I saw the testimony he gave. I don't know what his lawyer understands by being a confessor, but to me, the statement is a full confessor's statement. He named three people. Two of them are already in custody. The other one's name was also mentioned, but they were not arrested."

Altaylı wrote that following these words from his source, he commented, "If this statement isn't a confession, then what would be?" Reminding that Kütahyalı's lawyer had previously said, "my client is not a confessor," Altaylı conveyed his own interpretation in response with the words, "It might not be a confession, it could be snitching."
Altaylı also suggested that the testimony in question might soon be revealed to the public.
The full text of Altaylı's article is as follows:
"Is it a confession or is it snitching!
Yesterday evening, a friend of mine who gets good information from government and judicial circles called.
“You were right, or rather, the sources giving you information were right,” he said.
I laugh at such situations. You know how people start explaining something unprepared, without understanding what topic is being discussed, as if you already know what is going through their mind.
“I didn't understand what I was right about, or what my sources were right about,” I said.
“The confessor issue, you know,” he said.
Then I understood.
He was talking about the fact that I had written that Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı was a confessor and would be released very soon.
“I saw the testimony he gave. I don't know what his lawyer understands by being a confessor, but to me, the statement is a full confessor's statement. He named three people. Two of them are already in custody. The other one's name was also mentioned, but they were not arrested. His lawyer told you my client is not a confessor, but if this statement isn't a confession, then what would be?” he said.
I laughed.
“It might not be a confession, it could be snitching,” I said.
I think that testimony will come out soon, it won't remain secret."
News Source: 12punto
Most Read
How the ISIS terrorist preparing for an attack in Istanbul was neutralized
Apple's foldable phone price tag to set a new record
YÖK launches investigation into 23 foundation higher education institutions
Two-day sale and collateral traffic in Gökçek family allegations
Another bankruptcy in the construction sector
Detention warrants for 31 lawyers, searches at 39 offices
Journalist Oya Lale Arslan detained
Footage emerges of Berhan Şimşek allegedly assaulting his former partner
Massive compensation claim against Acun Ilıcalı
New seizure order in the Süleymancılar investigation