Court of Cassation President Akarca: We have deep disagreements with the Constitutional Court
Court of Cassation President Mehmet Akarca made a statement regarding the second ruling of rights violation issued by the Constitutional Court (AYM) concerning Can Atalay, a convict in the Gezi Park case who was elected as a deputy from the Workers' Party of Turkey (TİP).
Court of Cassation President Mehmet Akarca made a statement regarding the second ruling of rights violation issued by the Constitutional Court concerning Can Atalay, who was elected as a deputy from the Workers' Party of Turkey (TİP).
During his visit to the Afyonkarahisar Governor's Office, President Akarca stated that there have been long-standing differences in the interpretation of the individual application process and the Constitution, noting, "It is a fact that we have serious and deep disagreements stemming from the differences in interpretation regarding the examination of the individual application process, which has been ongoing for about 5-6 years, and the state of the Constitution."
WHAT HAPPENED?
The 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation evaluated the Constitutional Court's ruling on Can Atalay and decided that the AYM's rights violation ruling had no legal value. The Chamber also decided not to comply with the AYM's second rights violation ruling. This decision was widely debated in political circles.
News Source : 12punto
Most Read
Historic words from Özgür Özel at the CHP group meeting
Air Force Academy student Veli Bilgin has died
Striking picture for Özgür Özel's 'New Party'
The PKK opening and Özgür Özel’s path!..
How did the newspapers view Özgür Özel's farewell to the CHP?
He killed his wife by slitting her throat: Their children witnessed the moments
Tuncer Bakırhan calls for a framework law
Here are the names that will be in Özgür Özel's new party!
What did the CHP do?
Güler leaves questions regarding Özgür Özel unanswered