In a post on his social media account, where he shared documented evidence, the courtthedecision to continue detention issuedthe decisionisunjustlyit wasalleged thatit was found.
Karalar, documents uin the objection he filedregarding the evidence presentedagainst him, he stated that it was notinthe recordsat all.he said.
Zeydan Karalar, in a post he madeHestated thatthey have appealed this situation on these grounds.
Hereis Karalar'sh is posting:
In the decision regarding the continuation of my detention, "wiretap records, expert reports, HTS records, and MASAK reports" are cited as strong evidence of a crime suspicion was presented as evidence.
However, there is no wiretap recordin the file regarding me, no expert report, no MASAK report, and no HTS (telecommunication) records against me.
Although we requestedthese records, which were cited as the basisfor the decision, through a petition we submitted to the court, we have not yet received an answer.We could not receive a response.
I leave it to the discretion of the public.
In the decision regarding the continuation of my detention, "wiretap records, expert reports, HTS records, and MASAK reports" were cited as evidence of strong suspicion of a crime.
— Zeydan Karalar (@ZeydanKaralar01) December 20, 2025
However, there are no wiretap records, expert reports, MASAK reports, or any HTS records against me in the file... pic.twitter.com/J0xdH0Z2bI
News Source: 12punto
