Enforcement shock for retired Council of State member who filed lawsuit against additional MTV
Retired Council of State member Tacettin Şimşek faced enforcement proceedings in the lawsuit he filed against the additional Motor Vehicle Tax (MTV). This situation is being evaluated as a deterrent step for future lawsuits.
Retired Council of State member Tacettin Şimşek, who filed a lawsuit against the additional Motor Vehicle Tax (MTV) introduced in 2023 on the grounds of earthquake-related expenditures, unexpectedly found himself facing enforcement proceedings. Şimşek had filed a lawsuit in the Ankara Administrative Court, arguing that the additional MTV was unconstitutional.
According to the report by Erdoğan Süzer from Sözcü, after the court rejected the case, it caused surprise that the Ministry of Treasury and Finance initiated enforcement proceedings against Tacettin Şimşek without providing any notification. Şimşek's lawyer, Ali Erdem Gündoğan, stated that this enforcement action was unlawful and expressed that it was intended to intimidate citizens who might file similar lawsuits. Opposition parties had also objected to the additional MTV application, but the Constitutional Court had rejected this application.
TOOK IT TO THE ECHR
Şimşek's case was rejected first by the administrative court and then by the appellate court, and Şimşek took the case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). While awaiting the ECHR's decision, it drew attention that the Ministry of Treasury and Finance initiated enforcement proceedings without prior notification.
Lawyer Gündoğan stated that the enforcement proceedings should be withdrawn and that they should be notified as to where the attorney's fee should be paid. Gündoğan said, "This enforcement action shows that the Ministry of Treasury and Finance is trying to intimidate those who will file lawsuits in an unlawful manner."
"HE IS BEING PUNISHED FOR FILING THE LAWSUIT"
Evaluating the enforcement decision, lawyer Ali Erdem Gündoğan said, "If Şimşek had won the case, he would not have been able to directly initiate enforcement against the Treasury; he would have first had to apply to the administration with an account number and a petition. The same rule applies to the Treasury. Therefore, the action taken is contrary to administrative law. Tacettin Şimşek is being punished for filing this lawsuit."
News Source: 12punto
Most Read
Galatasaray announces injury updates for Osimhen, Lemina, and Singo
Attention online sellers: Tax monitoring expanded
VAR for the Fenerbahçe-Beşiktaş derby has been announced!
Bridges and highways are being privatized: 15 July and FSM are also on the list
New details emerge in 'panel' operation targeting lawyers
Another bankruptcy in the construction sector
Peugeot September 2026 price list is out
First statement from Osimhen after injury in Başakşehir match
Özlem Şanver: 'He said he would change, I believed him; should I be beaten just because I didn't leave?'
Detention warrants for 31 lawyers, searches at 39 offices