Crisis erupts before the YENI Party can settle in Parliament! Notable application from the 'Absolute Nullity' CHP
The 'absolute nullity' administration of the CHP has argued in an application to the Speaker of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) that the YENI Party cannot be granted the group floor, offices, and corridors currently held by the CHP. The application requests that the existing group areas be preserved as part of the CHP's institutional continuity and that a separate allocation be made for the YENI Party.
The 'absolute nullity' administration of the CHP has submitted an application to the Speaker of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) regarding the allocation of offices and corridors for the YENI Party in Parliament.
The application argues that while changes in the number of deputies may affect General Assembly seating and service needs, it does not create a rule of "succession" that would allow existing group spaces allocated to political parties to be automatically transferred to a new party.

The application states, "The group floor, group deputy chair offices, meeting rooms, and support units currently in use by the CHP must be preserved within the scope of the CHP's institutional continuity."
WHAT GROUNDS WERE LISTED IN THE APPLICATION?
The text emphasizes that the arrangement of workspaces in the TBMM is under the authority of the Parliamentary administration. It notes that General Assembly seating arrangements and the allocation of administrative spaces within the building are not the same process, stating that the former involves political weight and visibility, while the latter prioritizes the continuity of public service, physical facilities, and administrative decisions.
The application further argues that the formation of a new group does not automatically grant rights over the offices and corridors of the party from which it split. It notes that previous practices involved methods such as finding separate locations for new groups, performing renovations or construction, or implementing phased solutions.
The application, which states that the current usage allocated to the CHP is not a "claim of ownership" but a request for continued institutional representation and service continuity, argues that the new group's workspace needs should be met separately by the TBMM Speaker's Office.
The text cites past practices as examples, such as the designation of a new corridor and the vacating of offices for the Saadet Party in 2023, and the reallocation of former Virtue Party (FP) offices and rooms used for institutional duties for the Motherland Party (ANAVATAN) in 2005.
News Source: 12punto
Most Read
The unbearable lightness of posing while performing ablution
The fragility of civil society in Turkey through the lens of the ‘AHBAP Association’
A cold shower for Kılıçdaroğlu, who will take the podium after 1009 days
The behind-the-scenes of the mediator proposal presented to Özgür Özel revealed!
The consequences of military tension in Europe and Turkey
Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal's harsh 'Öcalan' reaction
New era for Istanbul-Ankara buses
What should we expect from technology in the next 10 years?
Who will be the CHP leader if the Court of Cassation overturns the nullity decision?
Attack on Turkish Ro-Ro ship off the coast of Russia