Arbitration Board upholds Eren Elmalı's suspension

Following its meeting today, the TFF Arbitration Board reviewed the files and reached the following decisions:

"1. E.2025/747 - K.2025/713

The appeal by footballer Adil Demirbağ against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/673 - K.2025-2026/750 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Adil Demirbağ with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

2. E.2025/749 - K.2025/714

The appeal by footballer Alberk Koç against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/686 - K.2025-2026/763 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Alberk Koç with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

3. E.2025/750 - K.2025/715

The appeal by footballer Ali Aytemur against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/748 - K.2025-2026/825 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Ali Aytemur with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

4. E.2025/751 - K.2025/716

The appeal by footballer Ali Emre Yanar against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/667 - K.2025-2026/744 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Ali Emre Yanar with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

5. E.2025/751 - K.2025/717

The appeal by footballer Barış Timur against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/679 - K.2025-2026/756 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Barış Timur with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

6. E.2025/763 - K.2025/718

The appeal by footballer Burak Asan against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/744 - K.2025-2026/821 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Burak Asan with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

7. E.2025/764 - K.2025/719

The appeal by footballer Çağlayan Menderes against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/738 - K.2025-2026/815 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Çağlayan Menderes with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

8. E.2025/765 - K.2025/720

The appeal by footballer Celil Yüksel against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/670 - K.2025-2026/747 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Celil Yüksel with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

9. E.2025/766 - K.2025/721

The appeal by footballer Emre Kaplan against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/708 - K.2025-2026/785 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Emre Kaplan with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

10. E.2025/767 - K.2025/722

The appeal by footballer Enes İşik against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/720 - K.2025-2026/797 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Enes İşik with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

11. E.2025/771 - K.2025/723

The appeal by footballer Erhan Çelenk against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/745 - K.2025-2026/822 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Erhan Çelenk with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

12. E.2025/772 - K.2025/724

The appeal by footballer Evren Eren Elmalı against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/659 - K.2025-2026/736 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Evren Eren Elmalı with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

13. E.2025/775 - K.2025/725

The appeal by footballer Furkan Bekleviç against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/668 - K.2025-2026/745 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Furkan Bekleviç with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

14. E.2025/777 - K.2025/726

The appeal by footballer Hakan Yeşil against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/698 K.2025-2026/775 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Hakan Yeşil with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

15. E.2025/779 - K.2025/727

The appeal by footballer Hüsamettin Yener against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/717 - K.2025-2026/794 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Hüsamettin Yener with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

16. E.2025/784 - K.2025/728

The appeal by footballer Kadir Seven against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/691 - K.2025-2026/768 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Kadir Seven with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

17. E.2025/785 - K.2025/729

The appeal by footballer Kerem Kayaarası against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/664 - K.2025-2026/741 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Kerem Kayaarası with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

18. E.2025/786 - K.2025/730

The appeal by footballer Mert Önal against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/714 - K.2025-2026/791 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Mert Önal with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

19. E.2025/789 - K.2025/731

The appeal by footballer Muhammed Birkan Tetik against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/722 - K.2025-2026/799 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Muhammed Birkan Tetik with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

20. E.2025/790 - K.2025/732

The appeal by footballer Muhammed Taha Güneş against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/660 - K.2025-2026/737 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Muhammed Taha Güneş with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

21. E.2025/792 - K.2025/733

The appeal by footballer Murat Cem Akpınar against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/712 - K.2025-2026/789 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Murat Cem Akpınar with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

22. E.2025/793 - K.2025/734

The appeal by footballer Mustafa Alptekin Çaylı against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/702 - K.2025-2026/779 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Mustafa Alptekin Çaylı with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

23. E.2025/794 - K.2025/735

The appeal by footballer Nazım Sangare against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/661 - K.2025-2026/738 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Nazım Sangare with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

24. E.2025/797 - K.2025/736

The appeal by footballer Osman Ertuğrul Çetin against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/718 - K.2025-2026/795 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Osman Ertuğrul Çetin with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

25. E.2025/798 - K.2025/737

The appeal by footballer Salih Malkoçoğlu against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/672 - K.2025-2026/749 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Salih Malkoçoğlu with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

26. E.2025/800 - K.2025/738

The appeal by footballer Tolga Kalender against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/699 - K.2025-2026/776 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Tolga Kalender with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,

27. E.2025/802 - K.2025/739

The appeal by footballer Uğur Kaan Yıldız against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/663 - K.2025-2026/740 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Uğur Kaan Yıldız with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application, uphold the decision, and reject the request for postponement,

28. E.2025/803 - K.2025/740

The appeal by footballer Üzeyir Ergün against the PFDK decision dated 13.11.2025 and numbered E.2025-2026/689 - K.2025-2026/766 was reviewed. As a result of the deliberation;

- Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of proof, legal qualification, and the determination of the penalty in the decision to punish footballer Üzeyir Ergün with a 45-day ban from football-related activities due to betting activities in accordance with Articles 57/2 and 13 of the FDT, it was decided unanimously to reject the application and uphold the decision,"

News Source: İHA