Find news published in the date range below
and and
and and
and and
Clear
Euro
Arrow
53,9371
Dollar
Arrow
44,7273
Sterling
Arrow
62,9996
Gold
Arrow
6251,6397
BIST 100
Arrow
10.729

Fifteen questions about the TUSAŞ attack...

Don't leave your news choices to an algorithm - decide for yourself what you read. Add 12punto to your preferred sources!

Who carried out the TUSAŞ raid, in which 22 of our citizens were injured and five of our citizens lost their lives?

The Minister of Interior provided the answer to this question in five or six hours:

The PKK!

The connection of the two individuals said to have carried out the act to the PKK was immediately established. Thus, the path was blocked for "those who might attempt to look for the killers elsewhere"!

However, the situation is not that simple.

Yes; on the surface, the militants pulling the triggers were PKK, but... Who gave the order? Whose project is this?

In other words, I am saying: forget the subcontractor, look at the instigator, if there is one, that is, the real boss!

I do not pontificate... Because I am neither a terrorism expert nor do I understand insidious games.

For this reason, I only ask questions. Let me begin:

***

One: Did the PKK carry out this attack following the MHP Chairman's invitation for Öcalan to come to Parliament to announce that he is liquidating his organization?

In other words, did the bloodthirsty terror barons in Qandil want to say to Bahçeli and Öcalan, "We are here"?

Two: Could the claim voiced in the pro-government media and AKP circles, "You did not take it seriously when we said Israel would attack Turkey. This attack was carried out by Israel," be true? Were Israel's fingerprints found in the assassination?

Three: The name of the attack site, Kazan, is the same as the city of Kazan in Russia, where President Erdoğan's BRICS summit was held...

Could the US and Western countries, who are uncomfortable with Turkey's full membership application to this formation, have specifically chosen this district to intimidate Erdoğan?

Four: When and where was the attack planned? Were the terrorists in Turkey; if not, when and by what route did they enter? Could they have entered our country along with the migrants who have riddled our borders? Where did they stay in Turkey? When, where, and from whom did they obtain all that weaponry and ammunition?

Five: Why was TUSAŞ chosen as the target? Could the attacks be related to projects that might disturb the PKK or other potential bosses?

Six: Why did the MIT (National Intelligence Organization) not intervene and prevent it before the attack? If he had known such an attack would take place, would MIT Undersecretary İbrahim Kalın have been at the AKP Headquarters at the same hours?

Seven: Was the act carried out by two people? Why is there no mention of the third terrorist whom some circles say blew himself up at the gate?

Eight: What were the two militants waiting for in a cafe for four hours before the attack?

Nine: While the attack was still ongoing and gunshots were being heard from inside, who leaked the security camera footage of the attackers to social media, and why?

Ten: Could the leaking of security camera records mean that the attackers were given support from the inside? Which building and which rooms of this important institution did the attackers enter? Could their goal have been to obtain certain cosmic information?

Did they transmit information to the outside? Where were they killed?

Eleven: What was the source of the explosion sounds coming from various points of the institution even after the attackers were neutralized? Do these explosions mean that explosives were placed at different points of the institution by someone before the attack?

Twelve: While even the facilities belonging to Baykar, the company of the President's son-in-law, are protected by the state's security forces, why is the security work of such an important state institution provided by a private company?

Thirteen: Could the fact that security is provided by a private company have led to a security weakness and even the transfer of information to the attackers in advance?

Fourteen: Why did the attackers not procure a vehicle, but instead chose to hijack a taxi and kill the driver? How did it happen that no one saw them while they were doing all this, and they were not caught by any MOBESE (CCTV) camera?

Fifteen: Could this attack be a message to those who govern the Republic of Turkey: "We can enter any of your institutions whenever we want"?