The global economy, particularly throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, was shaped by policies that envisioned a development approach based on market forces through the downsizing of the state; these policies were supported by the IMF, the World Bank, and the US Treasury, and were termed the Washington Consensus by economist John Williamson.
The "laissez-faire, laissez-passer" approach, which has dominated from 1980 to the present, has been characterized by "less state, more market," privatization, deregulation, and marketization initiatives. This neo-liberal project, which fundamentally advocates for the state to withdraw from the market, promotes a "minimal state" and "state-market opposition," and argues that "markets reach equilibrium on their own and achieve optimal balance without being bound by any rules," has now reached a dead end as it fails to address market failures.
Today, discussions are increasingly focused on who should manage the economy.
Is it the markets, which liberals call the "invisible hand"? Is it the state, known as the "visible hand," which seeks solutions to market failures and is called upon to act in every crisis? Or is it the optimal path, which has been discussed more frequently in recent times, of establishing the right balance between the state and the market?
Although governments have different priorities from time to time, aiming to increase the welfare level and quality of life of their citizens remains at the forefront of these priorities.
A higher level of welfare and development is being sought to be created, made more inclusive, and made more sustainable through better education, health, justice, environment, and other socio-economic conditions, alongside higher income.
Discussions regarding what the role of the state should be in fulfilling these priorities—where markets fail to find solutions—within the framework of the social state concept and in achieving sustainable development goals are continuing to grow.
To be continued...
Most Read
Striking picture for Özgür Özel's 'New Party'
The PKK opening and Özgür Özel’s path!..
How did the newspapers view Özgür Özel's farewell to the CHP?
He killed his wife by slitting her throat: Their children witnessed the moments
What did the CHP do?
Özel’s new party move in the world press
The New CHP, against CEHAPE
Kılıçdaroğlu's first message on Özgür Özel's new party announcement
From self-efficacy to despair
Fire at TUSAŞ engine factory in Eskişehir under control