Euro
Arrow
55,2696
Dollar
Arrow
49,2830
Sterling
Arrow
65,3784
Gold
Arrow
6659,2746
BIST 100
Arrow
12.209
Home > Authors > İrem Yılmaz > Women, men, and the G-Class: Power, security, or identity?

Women, men, and the G-Class: Power, security, or identity?

X Facebook WhatsApp Mail SUBSCRIBE Google News
Published: 23.09.2026 06:00

The Mercedes-Benz G-Class has one of the most interesting transformation stories in the automotive world. Developed for military and harsh off-road conditions, this vehicle—which has maintained its angular lines and almost industrial appearance for decades—is not just a car today; it is a powerful example for reading what women and men are actually buying when they purchase a vehicle.

Because what is being purchased in a G-Class is sometimes security, sometimes status, sometimes power, and sometimes the sense of identity that all of these offer at once. Moreover, the world that the G-Class represents has also changed. While it was once a symbol of an automotive culture traditionally associated with toughness, off-roading, and masculinity, today it appears in a completely different cultural sphere, stretching from Hollywood to the fashion world. Kim Kardashian sharing her G63 on social media as her “new toy” or Kylie Jenner being seen with her personalized G-Class at a young age are not just tabloid details of this transformation; they are signs showing that the car is no longer read solely through masculine power, but also through visibility, luxury, and personal image. In a way, the meaning loaded onto the G-Class has changed without the G-Class itself changing. From the outside, it still looks rugged, angular, large, and masculine. However, the same car has now turned into a power accessory for some female users as well. Fashion, luxury consumption, and car culture are blending here.

So, do women only buy status in a G-Class?

Automotive content creator Becky Evans' G-Class experience is a good example to look at this question. When she got behind the wheel of the G350d, which Mercedes-Benz allocated to her for a month, Evans also tried to understand why the G-Wagon is such a powerful status symbol. But what she described after starting to live with the car is not just about status. Nappa leather, wood trim, and the luxurious interior certainly catch her attention. But she also talks about the sense of security created by the high driving position, the feeling of solidity, daily usability, and the comfort the car offers while transporting her family.

This gives rise to a more general question: Do women and men really buy different things from a car, or do they load different justifications and meanings onto the same car?

The automotive world has an old cliché about this: Men are interested in the engine, power, and performance; for women, color, design, and how the car looks are more important. Yet, research shows that this distinction is too simplistic.

In a study where more than two thousand drivers were evaluated, safety and reliability took the top spots among eight criteria in car selection, while design and performance remained at the bottom. In broader new car buyer data, the preference rankings of women and men are largely similar. While women tend to place slightly more importance on safety, fuel economy, and environmental features, performance, power, design, comfort, and even image gain slightly more weight for men. In other words, it is not really possible to assume that it is the women who want the car because of its appearance and the image it creates.

Why is the G-Class different?

Because the G-Class puts three different values we expect from a car into the same package: functional value with safety, durability, performance, and ease of use; emotional value with comfort, dominance, confidence, and driving pleasure; and symbolic value with status, prestige, power, identity, and its image in the eyes of others.

Research on SUVs indicates that a high driving position and a more robust vehicle structure can create a greater sense of security in drivers. It has even been researched whether this sense of security affects driver behavior. Considering the tendency of women to place more weight on safety and reliability in car selection, explaining the appeal of the G-Class solely through prestige remains incomplete.

The physical character of the vehicle also feeds this feeling. The doors are not the type that you pull and close lightly; they make you feel their weight. The unique metallic sound of the locking mechanism has been compared to a rifle mechanism in the automotive press for years. The G-Class gives its user a sense of solidity before it even moves.

But the truly interesting contrast begins when you open the door: exposed hinges on the outside, flat surfaces, upright windows, and an industrial body; inside, however, there is leather, wood, digital screens, ambiance, and high comfort. Viewed from the outside, it is almost a military object; inside, it is a luxurious living space. Perhaps part of the G-Class's appeal, especially for the modern urban user, lies precisely in this contradiction: Strong, solid, and untouchable to the outside; comfortable, refined, and sheltered on the inside.

It would not be correct to read this as a psychology unique only to women. However, it is a very powerful combination for the contemporary consumer who wants power and security, visibility and privacy, toughness and comfort in the same object. Moreover, the story of the G-Class does not stop there.

There is now a fully electric G-Class as well: the Mercedes-Benz G 580 with EQ Technology. According to official Mercedes data, the vehicle's combined CO² emissions during use are 0 g/km. Carrying a design that has insisted on not changing for over forty years into the electric car era is symbolic in itself: the same angular body, the same status and power indicator are preserved; but this time, the discourse of technology and environmental transformation of electric mobility is added to the car's identity.

Thus, the G-Class turns into an object that can carry different meanings for different user groups, generations, and value systems. Perhaps what the G-Class really tells us is that gender alone is not a sufficient explanation for car preference. Age, income, lifestyle, family structure, and the meaning the person attaches to the car are at least as decisive as gender. The same G-Class can offer performance to one user, a sense of security to another, status to a third, and a feeling of power and independence to yet another.

Then perhaps we are asking the wrong question. The issue is not which car women choose and which one men choose; it is how we want to see ourselves and how we want to show ourselves to the world when we get behind the wheel. In the case of the G-Class, what is purchased is not just a car: for some, it is security; for others, power; for others, status. And for some, it is a single thing that all three say at once: “I am here.”

Author's Latest Articles All Articles